2021
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-correlations as a diagnostic tool for primordial gravitational waves

Abstract: We explore and corroborate, by working out explicit examples, the effectiveness of cross-correlating stochastic gravitational wave background anisotropies with CMB temperature fluctuations as a way to establish the primordial nature of a given gravitational wave signal. We consider the case of gravitational wave anisotropies induced by scalar-tensor-tensor primordial non-Gaussianity. Our analysis spans anisotropies exhibiting different angular behaviours, including a quadrupolar dependence. We … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in solid inflation their size is similar, for a supersolid the monopole gets enhanced by a factor 1/c 3 s2 for small c s2 . This leads a characteristic signature of supersolid inflation: the non-linear and local corrections to the tensor PS that becomes rather different from solid inflation, as discussed in [36] where TTS predictions for the standard solid inflation [10] scenario are compared with another "isotropic" (in the sense that the f TTS gives a monopole) model [37].…”
Section: Jhep06(2021)147mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While in solid inflation their size is similar, for a supersolid the monopole gets enhanced by a factor 1/c 3 s2 for small c s2 . This leads a characteristic signature of supersolid inflation: the non-linear and local corrections to the tensor PS that becomes rather different from solid inflation, as discussed in [36] where TTS predictions for the standard solid inflation [10] scenario are compared with another "isotropic" (in the sense that the f TTS gives a monopole) model [37].…”
Section: Jhep06(2021)147mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former could leave a signature in LSS next-generation experiments, giving a specific imprint 22 on the distribution of galaxies [33,48,49], while the latter could play a crucial role in the generation of anisotropies of the gravitational waves background [36,37,50,51].…”
Section: Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their cross-correlation with CMB temperature anisotropies has instead first been considered in Refs. [37,38] and used to forecast constraints on primordial non-Gaussian signals originated by scalar-tensor-tensor interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forecasts of detection prospects for this monopole signal with ground and space-based detectors were shown in, e.g., [5,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Such backgrounds are however also expected to display anisotropies (direction dependence) in the GW energy density Ω GW (f, n), which can be generated either at the time of their production [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] or during their propagation in our perturbed universe [25][26][27][28]. While the former generation mechanism is source/model-dependent, the latter is model-independent and ubiquitous for all the SGWB sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our analysis we have neglected the instrumental noise of CMB experiment, since it is well known that at the multipoles we are interested in ( 100), available CMB data are completely cosmic variance dominated. On the interferometer side, we have instead considered the expected noise levels of LISA and BBO, following [24,56]; for BBO, we have only considered the two units of aligned detectors in the star-of-David [57,58]. The corresponding noise angular power-spectra are plotted in Figure 6 in Appendix B.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%