2020
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01039-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-codal integration of bridging-event information in narrative understanding

Abstract: Visual narratives communicate event sequences by using different code systems such as pictures and texts. Thus, comprehenders must integrate information from different codalities. This study addressed such cross-codal integration processes by investigating how the codality of bridging-event information (i.e., pictures, text) affects the understanding of visual narrative events. In Experiment 1, bridging-event information was either present (as picture or text) or absent (i.e., not shown). The viewing times for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(93 reference statements)
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This would be consistent with proposals that sustained negativities index processes of holding information in memory to resolve ambiguities for a mental model in discourse (Baggio 2018 ; van Berkum 2009 ). This ERP pattern is consistent with behavioral findings of slower self-paced viewing times for panels following an inference, including action stars, compared to those after explicit events (Cohn and Wittenberg 2015 ; Huff et al 2020 ; Hutson et al 2018 ; Magliano et al 2015 ). One such study introduced working memory load tasks between images prior to participants reaching the inference-generating panel (Magliano et al 2015 ), which interfered with bridging inference generation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would be consistent with proposals that sustained negativities index processes of holding information in memory to resolve ambiguities for a mental model in discourse (Baggio 2018 ; van Berkum 2009 ). This ERP pattern is consistent with behavioral findings of slower self-paced viewing times for panels following an inference, including action stars, compared to those after explicit events (Cohn and Wittenberg 2015 ; Huff et al 2020 ; Hutson et al 2018 ; Magliano et al 2015 ). One such study introduced working memory load tasks between images prior to participants reaching the inference-generating panel (Magliano et al 2015 ), which interfered with bridging inference generation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Such backward-looking processes have long been demonstrated in research on verbal discourse (McNamara and Magliano 2009), and comparable inferential processing has been posited across both verbal and visual narratives (Gernsbacher et al 1990;Loschky et al 2020;Magliano et al 2019). Indeed, as in studies of verbal discourse (McKoon and Ratcliff 1992), costs related to inferential processing manifest at the image following omitted-information as longer viewing times and increased visual search processes (Huff et al 2020;Hutson et al 2018;Magliano et al 2015Magliano et al , 2017. Such costs are modulated by interference to both linguistic and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, reading times for grammatically congruous substituted emoji were slower compared to words in sentences, but viewing times for grammatically incongruous or homophonous rebus emoji were even slower (Cohn et al, 2018;Scheffler et al, 2021). In addition, viewing times for sentences substituted for images in visual sequences (symmetrical substitution, as in Figure 9B), were also found to be slower than their substituted pictures (Huff et al, 2020). However, onomatopoeia in visual narratives were actually viewed faster than the pictures they substituted 1 .…”
Section: Substitutivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of such Symmetrical Complex substitutive allocation would occur when a whole sentence replaces the Peak in a visual narrative sequence, as in Figure 9B . Like in the Asymmetrical example in Figure 9A , this Symmetrical Complex substitution replaces the Peak event in a visual narrative for text, only here the text is a whole sentence rather than a single unit (Cohn, 2019 ; Huff et al, 2020 ). This substitution has its own complex grammar (here simplified in notation) that uses categorical roles and constituent structure, but as a whole plays a categorical narrative role determined by the matrix grammar.…”
Section: Grammatical Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study used a comic book in which text was extensively integrated with visual information. However, previous research (Huff et al, 2020) indicates that the combination of text and pictures in comics requires more effortful processing compared to purely pictorial Ó 2021 Hogrefe Publishing Journal of Media Psychology (2021)…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%