2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-check of the dating results obtained by ESR and IR-OSL methods: Implication for the Pleistocene palaeoenvironmental reconstructions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability of the dating technique used in our present study is demonstrated by a number of comparative results obtained using both numerical dating methods (Kfeldspar-based IRSL, mollusc shell-based electron spin resonance (ESR), quartz-based optically stimulated afterglow (OSA), U-Th, 14 C) applied to the same sedimentary samples, and relative ones (Molodkov, 2012). The reliability of the dating technique used in our present study is demonstrated by a number of comparative results obtained using both numerical dating methods (Kfeldspar-based IRSL, mollusc shell-based electron spin resonance (ESR), quartz-based optically stimulated afterglow (OSA), U-Th, 14 C) applied to the same sedimentary samples, and relative ones (Molodkov, 2012).…”
Section: Luminescence Dating (Irsl)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The reliability of the dating technique used in our present study is demonstrated by a number of comparative results obtained using both numerical dating methods (Kfeldspar-based IRSL, mollusc shell-based electron spin resonance (ESR), quartz-based optically stimulated afterglow (OSA), U-Th, 14 C) applied to the same sedimentary samples, and relative ones (Molodkov, 2012). The reliability of the dating technique used in our present study is demonstrated by a number of comparative results obtained using both numerical dating methods (Kfeldspar-based IRSL, mollusc shell-based electron spin resonance (ESR), quartz-based optically stimulated afterglow (OSA), U-Th, 14 C) applied to the same sedimentary samples, and relative ones (Molodkov, 2012).…”
Section: Luminescence Dating (Irsl)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In particular, the ESR method has been successfully applied to C. glaucum/C. edule shells collected from different sites, furnishing ages consistent with independent geological evidence and characterized by a relatively low degree of uncertainty (Molodkov, 1996(Molodkov, , 2012Do gan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Electron Spin Resonance Chronologymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since Ikeya & Ohmura (), which firstly documented the effectiveness of ESR analysis on mollusc shells, a gradual improvement and reliability of the methodology has been reported in the literature (e.g. Molodkov, , , , ; Molodkov et al ., ; Molodkov & Bolikhovskaya, ; Alexanderson et al ., ). In particular, the ESR method has been successfully applied to C. glaucum / C. edule shells collected from different sites, furnishing ages consistent with independent geological evidence and characterized by a relatively low degree of uncertainty (Molodkov, , ; Doğan et al ., ).…”
Section: Late Quaternary Subsurface Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Independent age control can be provided e.g. by additional radiocarbon ( 14 C) dating (e.g., Thomas et al, 2006;Frechen et al, 2008;Murray et al, 2012), electron spin resonance dating (ESR; e.g., Molodkov, 2012;Zhao et al, 2012), amino acid racemization (AAR; e.g., Novothny et al, 2009) or uranium-thorium ( 230 U/Th) dating (this study) of (i) the sediment itself or of (ii) the under-and/or overlying deposits, depending on the availability of appropriate dating material (e.g. organic matter in case of 14 C dating).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%