2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Calibration and Minimum Precision Standards for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry: The 2005 ISCD Official Positions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The International Society for Clinical Densitometry recommends in vivo calibration when BMD from different models or makes are quantitatively compared [21]. We followed this recommendation and adjusted our data according to our own vivo calibration studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The International Society for Clinical Densitometry recommends in vivo calibration when BMD from different models or makes are quantitatively compared [21]. We followed this recommendation and adjusted our data according to our own vivo calibration studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the small variation in population BMD, uncalibrated results from different DXA devices can easily result in wrong conclusions when comparing BMD in different populations. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry recommends cross-calibration before BMD from different models or makes are quantitatively compared [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crosscalibration study of all three facilities was performed by having one technologist do ten phantom scans with repositioning, as recommended by the ISCD for the systems with the same technology (manufacturer and model; Shepherd et al 2006). We found a negligible difference in mean BMD between facilities, so a correction factor was not considered necessary.…”
Section: Bmd Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision errors are partly dependent on quality assurance systems to detect scanner changes and on operators' training and experience [2]. The evaluation of precision errors involves repeated measurements, with the International Society of Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) recommending either duplicate scans of 30 subjects or triplicate scans of 15 subjects [3] [4]. Precision errors may vary between individuals due to differences in bone status and biological variations, such as tissue inhomogeneity, and it is therefore important to measure a representative set of subjects [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%