2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3503092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Border Institutions and the Globalization of Innovation

Abstract: We identify strong cross-border institutions as a driver for the globalization of innovation. Using 67 million patents from over 100 patent offices, we introduce novel measures of innovation diffusion and collaboration. Exploiting staggered bilateral investment treaties as shocks to cross-border property rights and contract enforcement, we show that signatory countries increase technology adoption and sourcing from each other. They also increase R&D collaborations. These interactions result in technological co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Problems of cross-border regional innovation systems, their conceptual preconditions, empirical evidence and policy foundations are revealed by (Makkonen, Weidenfeld, 2016). The drivers of innovation globalization (Bian, Meier, Ting Xu, 2021) consider strong cross-border institutions to help reduce imbalances in collaboration as well as increase the mobility of innovation processes across countries. The authors argue that, first, cross-border institutions are less affected by shocks, since their processes are mainly domestic rather than international; second, it is difficult to organize and determine the level of innovativeness within a large number of countries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Problems of cross-border regional innovation systems, their conceptual preconditions, empirical evidence and policy foundations are revealed by (Makkonen, Weidenfeld, 2016). The drivers of innovation globalization (Bian, Meier, Ting Xu, 2021) consider strong cross-border institutions to help reduce imbalances in collaboration as well as increase the mobility of innovation processes across countries. The authors argue that, first, cross-border institutions are less affected by shocks, since their processes are mainly domestic rather than international; second, it is difficult to organize and determine the level of innovativeness within a large number of countries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions lead to technological convergence. The effects are particularly strong for innovative processes and those countries that lag behind in technological development or have weak domestic institutions (Bian, Meier, Jean-Marie and Xu, Ting, 2021). Innovation is characterized by positive consequences and the combining of different resources (Wuchty, Jones, Uzzi, (2007), Bloom, Schankerman, Van Reenen, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we control for the impact of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) between two signatory countries on cross-border activities, as BITs could protect and stimulate foreign investment, for example through cross-border mergers (Bhagwat, Brogaard and Julio, 2021) and international collaboration in producing innovation (Bian, Meier and Xu, 2021). Online Appendix Table B6 shows that the coefficients on political and economic factors remain significant after controlling for the BIT effect.…”
Section: Do Country-level Factors Influence Soes' Decisions On Cross-...mentioning
confidence: 99%