2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93916-2_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Border Criminal Evidence and the Future European Public Prosecutor. One Step Back on Mutual Recognition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is more, such case law may provide for further insights into the real scope of the problem of admissibility of evidence. We will then see whether the worry expressed by Allegrezza and Mosna become true that 'the non-admission of cross-border evidence' will be a 'highly probable result', 47 a viewpoint also shared by S ¸andru and others. 48 My interpretation is a bit different: a more farreaching harmonization of criminal procedure in relation to the admission of evidence wasand still…”
Section: Need Of Evidence On (In-)admissibility Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is more, such case law may provide for further insights into the real scope of the problem of admissibility of evidence. We will then see whether the worry expressed by Allegrezza and Mosna become true that 'the non-admission of cross-border evidence' will be a 'highly probable result', 47 a viewpoint also shared by S ¸andru and others. 48 My interpretation is a bit different: a more farreaching harmonization of criminal procedure in relation to the admission of evidence wasand still…”
Section: Need Of Evidence On (In-)admissibility Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%