Cross-border acquisitions by Indian multinationals: Asset exploitation or asset augmentation?

Abstract

This paper examines cross-border acquisitions by Indian multinationals and places them in the context of Emerging Country Multinationals. It tests hypotheses based on internalisation theory and the resource based view to ask if these firms are asset exploiting or asset augmenting in their takeover behaviour. Internal financial and technological resources are found to be important explanatory variables, as is asset seeking; of brands, technology and market access. The home environment in India allows firms to amass profits, to manage in a culturally diverse setting and to develop asset bundling skills. All these factors are significant in determining cross-border acquisitions.

How Multinational Banks in India Gain Legitimacy: Organisational Practices and Resources Required for Implementation

“…However, rooted in an economic perspective, this body of research is more concerned with entry mode selection and the efficiency of MNEs' investment decisions (Santangelo and Meyer 2017) than with the question of how to circumvent frequent adverse local conditions and LOF. Scholars point out that the OLI paradigm may not be sufficient in explaining internationalisation decisions to enter distant (or high LOF) markets (Buckley and Ghauri 2004;Buckley et al 2016), as it can undermine the question of local sociopolitical dynamics around the expansion of MNEs into the targeted environment. In contexts of high LOF, foreign actors can potentially face discrimination from a range of actors, including nonbusiness entities such as the government ([Li et al 2013] in the case of domestic firms in transitional economies) as well as other influential local actors ( [Barros 2014] in the case of Petrobras when interacting with local media).…”

Cultural distance, political risk and location decisions of emerging-market multinationals: a comparison between Chinese and Indian firms

“…First, we extend institutional theory by analyzing if emerging market-MNEs challenge some of the assumptions originally arising from MNEs from developed economies. In doing so, we also contribute to the epistemological debate generated among international business scholars about the validity of extant theories in the case of emerging-market MNEs (Buckley et al, 2016a;Cuervo-Cazurra, 2012;Mathews, 2006;Rugman, 2010). As Xu and Meyer (2013) In subsequent sections, we present theoretical explanations and develop hypotheses on the different impact of cultural distance and political risk on Chinese and Indian OFDI location.…”

Do Parent Units Benefit from Reverse Knowledge Transfer?

“…Unlike the DMNEs, the acquisitions of emerging market MNEs (EMNEs), especially in the developed markets, are driven by knowledge seeking motives to a large extent (Bangara, Freeman and Schroder, 2012;Buckley et al, 2016a;Jormanainen and Koveshnikov, 2012;Kedia, Gaffney and Clampit, 2012;Luo and Tung, 2007;Mathews, 2006;Thite et al, 2015;Wilkinson, Wood and Demirbag, 2014). As latecomers, these acquisitions are vital for them to rapidly catch up with their global competitors (springboard).…”