2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1219983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CropQuant-Air: an AI-powered system to enable phenotypic analysis of yield- and performance-related traits using wheat canopy imagery collected by low-cost drones

Abstract: As one of the most consumed stable foods around the world, wheat plays a crucial role in ensuring global food security. The ability to quantify key yield components under complex field conditions can help breeders and researchers assess wheat’s yield performance effectively. Nevertheless, it is still challenging to conduct large-scale phenotyping to analyse canopy-level wheat spikes and relevant performance traits, in the field and in an automated manner. Here, we present CropQuant-Air, an AI-powered software … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To collect large-scale rice imagery under field conditions, current methods range from satellite remote sensing, light airplane, to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs; such as drones) and ground-based phenotyping devices. These phenotyping devices had diverse advantages and disadvantages: (a) Satellite sensing system was long distance and ultrascale, but its imagery was relatively low resolution, making it difficult to capture small organ-level objects such as rice panicles [ 18 ]; (b) light airplanes were normally equipped with hyper- and multispectral image sensors for large-scale field surveillance; still, it was difficult to acquire clear panicle-level objects due to high flight altitudes and speed [ 19 ]; (c) low-altitude UAVs fitted with high-resolution red–green–blue (RGB) cameras have been used in field phenotyping popularly, which were reported for their capabilities to acquire imagery with organ-level resolutions when flying at low altitudes [ 20 ]; (d) ground-based devices were usually used to collect very high-resolution 2-dimensional (2D) or 3D plant images at fixed locations and angles; however, their applications were restricted in scalability because of their mobility in rice paddy fields [ 21 ]. Among the above phenotyping approaches, drone-based phenotyping clearly possesses advantages in flexibility, scalability, and cost effectiveness, which is likely to be useful when collecting rice panicle signals at a large scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To collect large-scale rice imagery under field conditions, current methods range from satellite remote sensing, light airplane, to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs; such as drones) and ground-based phenotyping devices. These phenotyping devices had diverse advantages and disadvantages: (a) Satellite sensing system was long distance and ultrascale, but its imagery was relatively low resolution, making it difficult to capture small organ-level objects such as rice panicles [ 18 ]; (b) light airplanes were normally equipped with hyper- and multispectral image sensors for large-scale field surveillance; still, it was difficult to acquire clear panicle-level objects due to high flight altitudes and speed [ 19 ]; (c) low-altitude UAVs fitted with high-resolution red–green–blue (RGB) cameras have been used in field phenotyping popularly, which were reported for their capabilities to acquire imagery with organ-level resolutions when flying at low altitudes [ 20 ]; (d) ground-based devices were usually used to collect very high-resolution 2-dimensional (2D) or 3D plant images at fixed locations and angles; however, their applications were restricted in scalability because of their mobility in rice paddy fields [ 21 ]. Among the above phenotyping approaches, drone-based phenotyping clearly possesses advantages in flexibility, scalability, and cost effectiveness, which is likely to be useful when collecting rice panicle signals at a large scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In wheat, several case studies have been reported in using N response-related patterns to examine N responsiveness and NUE features, including (a) site-specific N management was enabled by aerial phenotyping to assess plant canopy’s N status to estimate available N content in the soil and thus high NUE genotypes [ 31 ]; (b) 3D point clouds were used to measure canopy structural differences to classify varietal NUE performance [ 32 ]; (c) vegetative indices measured under different N applications were used to determine optimized N requirement [ 33 ]; a range of growth traits such as plant height [ 34 ], leaf area index [ 35 ], leaf greenness [ 36 ], phenology [ 37 ], and spike number [ 38 ] were employed to derive N utilization-related indices such as N-utilization efficiency, NupE, and NHI, facilitating studies on N uptake, N utilization, N responsiveness, and N management. Nevertheless, much research focused on specific traits or proxies measured at limited time points during the season, which overly simplified the dynamic feature of N response and related phenotypic changes [ 22 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%