2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop yield, nitrogen acquisition and sugarcane quality as affected by interspecific competition and nitrogen application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
32
2
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
32
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, intercropping removes more nutrients from the soil than corresponding monocrops and this has been observed in the present study and also in previous studies (Xia et al 2013;Yang et al 2013;Zhang and Li 2003). Faba bean/maize intercropping N acquisition enhancement ranged from 9 to 32 % compared with monocultures at different N levels (Li et al 2011b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As a consequence, intercropping removes more nutrients from the soil than corresponding monocrops and this has been observed in the present study and also in previous studies (Xia et al 2013;Yang et al 2013;Zhang and Li 2003). Faba bean/maize intercropping N acquisition enhancement ranged from 9 to 32 % compared with monocultures at different N levels (Li et al 2011b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Many studies have found sucrose content to be unaffected by N fertilization Thorburn et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2013), while in some cases a nega- As expected, the efficiency of 15 N recovery was decreased by higher application rates. The main fate of N fertilizer (about 20 to 40 %) applied to sugarcane is to remain in the soil, where the N immobilized by microorganisms resides in the organic fraction and is temporarily unavailable to the crop (Gava et al, 2005;Oliveira et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Assim como o observado por Yang et al (2013) ao avaliar o consórcio entre cana-de-açúcar e soja, no Tabela 2. Valor de p da matriz de correlação entre a massa de matéria seca de plantas daninhas, em sistemas consorciados com leguminosas, e a massa de matéria seca de plantas daninhas da testemunha sem capina e sem leguminosa, amostradas aos 142 dias após a semeadura (1) .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Resende et al (2003) e Ambrosano et al (2013) verificaram que Crotalaria juncea pode reduzir a produtividade de colmos, quando consorciada com cana-de-açúcar. Yang et al (2013) avaliaram o consórcio entre a cana-de-açúcar e a soja e constataram que a soja reduziu a produtividade da cana-de-açúcar. Contudo, Li et al (2013) observaram benefícios do sistema de consorciação entre cana-de-açúcar e soja, em que houve aumento da produtividade de colmos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified