2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13041682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop Wild Relatives (CWR) Priority in Italy: Distribution, Ecology, In Situ and Ex Situ Conservation and Expected Actions

Abstract: The study presents an updated overview of the 14 non-endemic threatened crop wild relatives (CWR) in Italy: Aegilops biuncialis, Ae. uniaristata, Ae. ventricosa, Asparagus pastorianus, Beta macrocarpa, Brassica insularis, B. montana, Crambe hispanica subsp. hispanica, C. tataria subsp. tataria, Ipomoea sagittata, Lathyrus amphicarpos, L. palustris, Vicia cusnae and V. serinica. Geographical distribution, ecology (with plant communities and habitat 92/43/EEC aspects), genetics (focused on gene pools), property,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(140 reference statements)
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Odoratissimum, and R. eriocalyx, it is suggested to launch specific actions to verify if they are Crop Wild Relatives (CWR) and which is their genetic affinity with the respective parental species [72]. CWR taxa are potential sources of traits beneficial to crops, such as pest or disease resistance, yield improvement, or stability [73], and once identified, there is an imperative to effectively conserve these critical taxa in situ (i.e., in natural habitats managed as genetic reserves) and ex situ (primarily as the seeds in gene banks or as mature individuals in field collections) to underpin future world food [74,75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odoratissimum, and R. eriocalyx, it is suggested to launch specific actions to verify if they are Crop Wild Relatives (CWR) and which is their genetic affinity with the respective parental species [72]. CWR taxa are potential sources of traits beneficial to crops, such as pest or disease resistance, yield improvement, or stability [73], and once identified, there is an imperative to effectively conserve these critical taxa in situ (i.e., in natural habitats managed as genetic reserves) and ex situ (primarily as the seeds in gene banks or as mature individuals in field collections) to underpin future world food [74,75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, further and deepening study needs to identify the main stressful factors that threaten its growth, development, and fitness. Due to the objective difficulty to preserve the taxon in situ and pending further experimental data on its ecology, as indicated for other nationally threatened CWRs species [83], ex situ conservation actions are recommended. For the ex situ propagation, we recommend growing the seedlings at least half sunlight (1200 µmol (photons) m −2 s −1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A widely accepted definition for landraces was created by Camacho Villa [12], a concept that integrates the earlier works of Harlan [13] and Hawkes [14]. A landrace is a cultivated plant with a historical origin and a recognizable identity that lacks any formal genetic improvement or breeding [12][13][14][15][16] These plants, as well as their wild crop relatives, possess a high genetic plasticity, expressed by a specific gene pool that represents a reservoir of diversity that can be tapped into by organisms to adapt to a changing environment, and breeders for crop improvement [17,18]. Landraces are well adapted to the area where they are cultivated, and are frequently associated with traditional farming systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%