2010
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2010.0236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop Response following Tall Fescue Sod and Agronomic Crops

Abstract: Sod-based production systems have been successful in the southeastern and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States as an alternative to conventional tillage systems. However, research comparing these systems in North Carolina is limited. Th erefore, research was conducted at four locations in North Carolina to compare corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield when these crops were strip tilled following 4 yr of continuous tall … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From 2004 to 2008, land‐use treatments consisted of tall fescue vs. reduced tillage production of corn and cotton in rotation. In 2009, corn, cotton, peanut, and soybean were planted following both land uses, and results with all four locations are presented by Drake et al (2010). Following the 2009 season, plot integrity was maintained at the two locations described here with corn planted during 2010 and 2011, cotton planted during 2012, and peanut planted during 2013 in the entire test area.…”
Section: Locations Soil Characteristics and Cropping Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From 2004 to 2008, land‐use treatments consisted of tall fescue vs. reduced tillage production of corn and cotton in rotation. In 2009, corn, cotton, peanut, and soybean were planted following both land uses, and results with all four locations are presented by Drake et al (2010). Following the 2009 season, plot integrity was maintained at the two locations described here with corn planted during 2010 and 2011, cotton planted during 2012, and peanut planted during 2013 in the entire test area.…”
Section: Locations Soil Characteristics and Cropping Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The experiment was conducted in North Carolina at the Peanut Belt Research Station located near Lewiston‐Woodville (36.07° N, −77.11° W) on a Norfolk loamy sand soil (fine‐loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kandiudult) with 80% sand, 15% silt, and 5% clay at the 0‐ to 3.1‐inch depth and at the Upper Coastal Plain Experiment Station located near Rocky Mount (35.893° N, −77.681° W) in a field consisting of a mix of Rains loamy sand soil (fine‐loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Typic Paleaquult) and Goldsboro loamy sand (fine‐loamy, siliceous, subactive, thermic Aquic Paleudult) with 55% sand, 37% silt, and 8% clay at the 0‐ to 3.1‐inch depth. These fields were a part of an experiment conducted by Drake et al (2010) from 2004 to 2009. Two other locations in the study by Drake et al (2010) were in commercial fields and were abandoned after the 2009 season.…”
Section: Locations Soil Characteristics and Cropping Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Communities of nematodes are frequently used as suitable bioindicators based on their occurrence in all types of soil, a high abundance and the presence of all trophic groups. Earlier studies on nematodes in maize throughout the world were focused mostly on plant-parasitic nematodes that feed on maize (Bernard et al, 2010;Bowen et al, 2008;Tylka et al, 2011) or the impact of crop rotation on nematode communities (Drake et al, 2010;Manachini et al, 2009;Rahman et al, 2007;Villenave et al, 2009). It was also mentioned that low infections of plant-parasitic nematodes may lead to greater availability of plant nutrients .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strip-tillage utilizes coulters and rolling baskets that create a residue-free, smooth seedbed to facilitate seed soil contact, increased soil temperature at planting and PRE herbicide activation. Previous peanut research in the U.S. indicated higher or equivalent yields with strip-tillage compared to conventional tillage systems (Faircloth et al 2012;Johnson et al 2001;Tubbs and Gallaher 2005;Wilcut et al 1987) while others report lower yields (Drake et al 2010;Jordan et al 2001). Finally, conservation tillage systems reduce input costs and can offer economic advantages over conventional tillage practices after several years of their successful adoption (Bowman et al 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%