2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop residue retention enhances soil properties and nitrogen cycling in smallholder maize systems of Chiapas, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, the rice plants responded to all sorts of organic amendments across different growth periods. Murphy et al (2016) emphasized that crop residue retention although enhanced soil properties, but did not significantly increased the total biomass of crop. The reason for the varied crop growth response to residue incorporation in soil could, therefore, be attributed to the chemical composition of the residue which determines its decomposability and (Rousk et al 2010).…”
Section: Crop Response To Organic Amendmentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present work, the rice plants responded to all sorts of organic amendments across different growth periods. Murphy et al (2016) emphasized that crop residue retention although enhanced soil properties, but did not significantly increased the total biomass of crop. The reason for the varied crop growth response to residue incorporation in soil could, therefore, be attributed to the chemical composition of the residue which determines its decomposability and (Rousk et al 2010).…”
Section: Crop Response To Organic Amendmentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even different organic forms of compost impart distinct soil quality characteristics based on either particle size or composting methods adopted, such as reported by authors in compost prepared from pig slurry incorporated with saw dust, wood chips, and wheat straw (Romano et al 2014;Pampuro et al 2016). Crop residue retention along with conventional tillage proved to be a promising option to reduce nutrient loss in the study of Murphy et al (2016) in small holder maize system. A study in the lines with similar objective of the present investigation compared dairy manure with hardwood biochar and outlined contrasting results on microbial communities and enzyme activities of the soil (Elzobair et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that many of these parameters are likely to change with tillage regime and crop residue management as reported by a large body of literature (e.g., Six et al, 1999; Lipiec et al, 2006; D’Haene et al, 2008; Murphy et al, 2016), which in return may influence soil microbial communities and the ecosystem services they provide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Awopegba et al (2017) suggested that the herbaceous mulches increased soil organic carbon, TN, and exchangeable cations more significantly. Eventually, the enhancement of soil fertility by the application of organic mulches along with crop residue retention in farms can improve soil functions and enhance nutrient use efficiency by recycling them through soils (Murphy et al, 2016;Mwango et al, 2016). For Season II, the mulches under the upland regime for taro cultivation could increase all of the soil properties.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%