2019 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/softcom.2019.8903738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop Classification using Multi-spectral and Multitemporal Satellite Imagery with Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, there is a tradeoff between temporal and spatial resolution, for example the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) acquires data with 1 meter resolution, but on a 3-year cycle [4]. For large-scale classification problems, temporal resolution becomes of utmost importance [29], especially since stochastic cloud cover can render any given satellite capture unusable. Moreover, transformer architectures have shown their efficacy on temporal satellite data [25].…”
Section: Machine Learning On Satellite Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, there is a tradeoff between temporal and spatial resolution, for example the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) acquires data with 1 meter resolution, but on a 3-year cycle [4]. For large-scale classification problems, temporal resolution becomes of utmost importance [29], especially since stochastic cloud cover can render any given satellite capture unusable. Moreover, transformer architectures have shown their efficacy on temporal satellite data [25].…”
Section: Machine Learning On Satellite Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Модель показала высокую меру точности классификации F-мера 88,7 %, сравнимую, а по нескольким классам превосходящую, точность для схожих моделей других авторов [Viskovic, 2019;. Наибольшая точность была достигнута для наиболее широко представленных классов: пшеницы, сои и подсолнечника.…”
Section: анализ результатовunclassified
“…According to the authors, although the use of S1 imagery affected the LCC, their ability to classify crop type was weaker than for S2 data. Viskovic et al (2019) used MT S1 and S2 data for crop classification. RF outperformed other classifiers (e.g., SVM, K-nearest neighbors) with an OA of 84.20%, and Kappa 0.82.…”
Section: Land-cover Classification On a Multitemporal S1 And S2 Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%