2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop classification of upland fields using Random forest of time-series Landsat 7 ETM+ data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
79
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently developed nonparametric machine learning algorithms, i.e., support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF), provide effective tools to identify different land cover classes, as they are not constrained by the assumption that the input parameters are normally distributed [34][35][36]. RF classifier has been given increasing attention with regards to crop mapping [37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently developed nonparametric machine learning algorithms, i.e., support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF), provide effective tools to identify different land cover classes, as they are not constrained by the assumption that the input parameters are normally distributed [34][35][36]. RF classifier has been given increasing attention with regards to crop mapping [37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the trees are created, classification results are obtained by majority voting. RF has reached around 85% OA in crop type classification using a multi-spectral time series of RapidEye images [62], and higher than 80% for a time series of Landsat7 images in homogeneous regions [13]. RF has two user-defined parameters: the number of trees and the number of features available to build each decision tree.…”
Section: Vegetation Index (Vi) Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing image classification is a convenient approach for producing these maps due to advantages in terms of cost, revisit time, and spatial coverage [10]. Indeed, remotely sensed image classification has been successfully applied to produce crop maps in homogeneous areas [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies were conducted using data from multiple sensors across many spatial, spectral, radiometric, and temporal resolutions for both irrigated and rainfed crops (Biggs et al 2006;Friedl et al 2010;Funk and Brown 2009;Gumma et al 2011;Loveland et al 2000;Ozdogan and Woodcock 2006;Pervez, Budde, and Rowland 2014;Pittman et al 2010;Teluguntla et al 2015a;Thenkabail et al 2009aThenkabail et al , 2009bWardlow, Egbert, and Kastens 2007;Xiao et al 2006;Yu et al 2013). These studies consider an ensemble of methods that include: (a) decision tree algorithms (De Fries et al 1998;Friedl and Brodley 1997;Ozdogan and Gutman 2008;Waldner, Canto, and Defourny 2015); (b) the random forest algorithm (Gislason, Benediktsson, and Sveinsson 2006;Tatsumi et al 2015); (c) Tassel cap brightness-greenness-wetness (Cohen and Goward 2004;Crist and Cicone 1984;Gutman et al 2008;Masek et al 2008); (d) space-time spiral curves and change vector analysis (Thenkabail, Schull, and Turral 2005); (e) phenological approaches Gumma et al 2011;Loveland et al 2000;Pan et al 2015;Teluguntla et al 2015a;Xiao et al 2006;Zhou et al 2016); (f) Hierarchical Image Segmentation (HSEG) software or HSeG (Tilton et al 2012); (g) support vector machines (Mountrakis, Im, and Ogole 2011;Shao and Lunetta 2012); (h) spectral matching techniques (Thenkabail et al 2007a); (i) pixel-and object-based methods usin...…”
Section: Introduction and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%