2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop and varietal diversification of rainfed rice based cropping systems for higher productivity and profitability in Eastern India

Abstract: Rice-rice system and rice fallows are no longer productive in Southeast Asia. Crop and varietal diversification of the rice based cropping systems may improve the productivity and profitability of the systems. Diversification is also a viable option to mitigate the risk of climate change. In Eastern India, farmers cultivate rice during rainy season (June–September) and land leftovers fallow after rice harvest in the post-rainy season (November–May) due to lack of sufficient rainfall or irrigation amenities. Ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where, d1, d2 and d3 the duration of first, second and third crops of the pattern Production efficiency: Production efficiency values in terms of kg/ha/day were calculated by total production in a cropping sequence divided by total duration of crops in that sequence (Lal et al, 2017;Tomer and Tiwari, 1990). Y1 + Y2 + Y3 Production efficiency = d1 + d2 + d3 Where, Y1: Yield of 1 st crop Y2: Yield of 2 nd crop Y3: Yield of 3 rd crop d1= Duration of 1 st crop of the pattern d2= Duration of 2 nd crop of the pattern d3= Duration of 3 rd crop of the pattern…”
Section: Land Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where, d1, d2 and d3 the duration of first, second and third crops of the pattern Production efficiency: Production efficiency values in terms of kg/ha/day were calculated by total production in a cropping sequence divided by total duration of crops in that sequence (Lal et al, 2017;Tomer and Tiwari, 1990). Y1 + Y2 + Y3 Production efficiency = d1 + d2 + d3 Where, Y1: Yield of 1 st crop Y2: Yield of 2 nd crop Y3: Yield of 3 rd crop d1= Duration of 1 st crop of the pattern d2= Duration of 2 nd crop of the pattern d3= Duration of 3 rd crop of the pattern…”
Section: Land Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Net income was calculated by subtracting total expenditure from the gross income which was computed by dividing the gross income with total expenditure (Mahamood et al, 2016, Ferdous et al 2017c,d, 2018. Where d 1 , d 2 and d 3 the duration of 1 st , 2 nd and 3 rd crop of the pattern Production efficiency value in terms of kg ha-1day-1was calculated by total main production a cropping pattern divided by total duration of crops in that pattern (Lal et al, 2017;Tomar and Tiwari, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison between crop sequences, the yield of all crops was converted into rice equivalent on the basis of prevailing market prices of individual crop (Lal et al, 2017). Rice equivalent yield (REY) was computed as yield of individual crop multiplied by market price of that crop divided by market price of rice.…”
Section: Rice Equivalent Yield (Rey)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, we have seen that the rice-fallow system non-significantly followed by ricelathyrus and rice-lentil systems recorded the lowest system productivity. Rice fallows, throughout South Asia, have been intensified with low water requiring pulse and oilseed crops [37]. But, the low system productivity of these systems might be due to several reasons viz.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vice versa situation was witnessed in the ricefallow-fallow, rice-lathyrus-fallow and rice-sunflower systems. In West Bengal, about 37.2% area under wet season rice cultivation has a subsequent fallow period in the dry season [50] Such a fallow period often blamed to have lowered the system productivity and net profit [37]. Besides, such fallow systems can have high GWP as it emits even more N 2 O than cropped field [51], perhaps due to a decrease in soil organic carbon content, thereby reducing the C:N ratio in soil [10].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%