2006
DOI: 10.1080/01431160600784192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop and land cover classification in Iran using Landsat 7 imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because single-date analysis in visible cropping intensity often does not take into account planting dates that vary from year to year. Therefore, multi-temporal analysis has greater potential to define irrigated areas [46]. Ultimately, classification results are conditional upon the temporal and spatial variability of the spectral signature of the land cover type in question, so suitable images must be available for the temporal approach to provide a complete inventory of all irrigated fields in a study area.…”
Section: Digital Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because single-date analysis in visible cropping intensity often does not take into account planting dates that vary from year to year. Therefore, multi-temporal analysis has greater potential to define irrigated areas [46]. Ultimately, classification results are conditional upon the temporal and spatial variability of the spectral signature of the land cover type in question, so suitable images must be available for the temporal approach to provide a complete inventory of all irrigated fields in a study area.…”
Section: Digital Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The features were surface reflectance composited at specific events of the growing season when crops are expected to behave differently than other land covers do. Among the cropland discrimination studies [46][47][48][49], five temporal features were selected: the maximum of the red band (max red), the minimum and maximum of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and the increasing and decreasing slopes of the NDVI profile ( Figure 7b). Soil preparation practices, such as tillage and sowing, clear the land surface contrasting with naturally-vegetated areas and resulting in higher reflectance in the red band.…”
Section: Cropland Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the spectral indices, the NDVI was commonly used because of its differential spectral response in presence of either irrigated or rainfed crops. The analysis of multiple satellite acquisitions over a growing season was shown to be more efficient, as it reflects the differences in phenological evolution between crops [107]. However, when a peak was observed within a known given small time period in an irrigation season, one image acquired at the right time may suffice to identify irrigated areas [92].…”
Section: Irrigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of irrigated areas is also easier to complete over arid or semi-arid regions. In these regions, almost all vegetative growth is linked to irrigation [107] and only a few classes have to be distinguished, whereas in humid areas, natural wetlands can be confused with irrigated areas [92].…”
Section: Irrigationmentioning
confidence: 99%