2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(200002)11:2<127::aid-jmri8>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crohn's disease evaluation: Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single-phase helical CT scanning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
65
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results may differ from previous studies, where Gd-enhancement showed a higher accuracy than T2W sequences in assessing disease activity (25,26). However, we used a potentially more optimized SPAIR FS technique, specifically in consideration of the challenges facing images acquired of gas-filled and peristaltic bowel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Our results may differ from previous studies, where Gd-enhancement showed a higher accuracy than T2W sequences in assessing disease activity (25,26). However, we used a potentially more optimized SPAIR FS technique, specifically in consideration of the challenges facing images acquired of gas-filled and peristaltic bowel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In addition to lack of ionizing radiation exposure, MR has the advantage of evaluation of stenotic lesions with MR fluoroscopy technique and conspicuity of abnormal bowel wall signal (6,42,43). However, the benefits of CT over MR include greater availability and robustness, shorter exam times, and higher spatial resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…True FISP sequence was picked up due to its short acquisition time, 1.5 s per slice, significantly reducing motion artifacts. Utilizing the true FISP sequence, image quality is unaffected by bowel motion and the use of antiperistaltic drugs can be avoided giving a major advantage in true FISP compared with other sequences, including 3D FLASH, which require pharmaceutical reduction of bowel motion [9,10,11,12]. The major difference between true FISP and the other steady-state sequences is that rephasing gradients are applied in all three directions, thus making the sequence velocity compensated in all three directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%