1988
DOI: 10.1109/52.10002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critiquing software specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most performance critics (e.g., FRAMER, JANUS, ROUNDSMAN [52), KATE [12]) do not select specific aspects of a product to critique; they evaluate the product as a whole to achieve the highest possible quality. Some critics selectively critique based on the policies specified by users.…”
Section: Critiquing Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most performance critics (e.g., FRAMER, JANUS, ROUNDSMAN [52), KATE [12]) do not select specific aspects of a product to critique; they evaluate the product as a whole to achieve the highest possible quality. Some critics selectively critique based on the policies specified by users.…”
Section: Critiquing Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LISP-CRITIC is capable of visualizing the effects of certain LISP functions [14]. KATE [12] critiques software specifications and backs up its critique with simulation scenarios designed to approximate the rich set of examples that software professionals use.…”
Section: Explanation and Argumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software engineering. KATE (Fickas & Nagarajan, 1988) critiques software specifications (for automated library systems) represented in an extended Petri net notation. The knowledge of the critic is represented as "cases" that consist of a pattern describing a behavior in a specification, links to one or more goals, simulation scenarios, and canned text descriptions.…”
Section: Short Descriptions Of Criticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of a critic, a tutor, and a hypertext system. KATE [8] critiques software specifications for automated library systems.…”
Section: Short Descriptions Of Criticsmentioning
confidence: 99%