2022
DOI: 10.1080/02601370.2022.2164434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critiques and evolutions of transformative learning theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The researchers finally brought their analysis which was done without prior discussion with one another, they cross checked data codes and themes, discussed placement of excerpts within subthemes, reached consensus after discussion, and finalized the names of themes. This researchers' triangulation lends greater credibility to the observations (27). In the sixth phase, the process of member checking, peer debriefing on final report and audit trailing were carried out.…”
Section: Credibility Thick Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The researchers finally brought their analysis which was done without prior discussion with one another, they cross checked data codes and themes, discussed placement of excerpts within subthemes, reached consensus after discussion, and finalized the names of themes. This researchers' triangulation lends greater credibility to the observations (27). In the sixth phase, the process of member checking, peer debriefing on final report and audit trailing were carried out.…”
Section: Credibility Thick Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…But transformational theory only talks about beliefs challenged by disorienting dilemma and intellectual discourse causing transformation. Whereas, transformation is a complex process, and it cannot occur without social interactions, a fact agreed by Mezirow in later articles ( 28 , 29 ). The cognitive processes causing transformation are still not completely understood and Transformational theory is still underconstruction ( 28 , 29 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study takes place in the rich academic debate on transformative learning theory (Eschenbacher, 2019;Hoggan and Hoggan-Kloubert, 2023;Hoggan, 2016) initially developed by the seminal work of Mezirow (Mezirow, 1978(Mezirow, , 1990(Mezirow, , 2000. In the following discussion, we developed, in several sections, how our findings concur with other research and, to a some extent, contribute to "a theory in progress" (Taylor and Cranton, 2013;Hoggan and Hoggan-Kloubert, 2023).…”
Section: Discussion and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imbrication of individual critical self-reflection and collective interactions in transformation Some researchers have expressed some critiques towards the work of Mezirow, considering that his transformative learning theory was too focussed on the individual with less consideration of the role of interactions with others in the transformation process (Christie et al, 2015;Hoggan and Hoggan-Kloubert, 2023). For Mezirow, the individual critical selfreflection is central to questioning and challenging frames of references, assumptions and meaning perspective (Kitchenham, 2008).…”
Section: Social Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%