2017
DOI: 10.1080/13602365.2017.1351771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critique of an ‘Artefactual’ landscape: Erich Mendelsohn's engagement with the built and natural environment, 1919–1931

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 He argues that Mendelsohn reversed the romantic relationship between landscape and the architect's vision by framing it as a primarily artificial, abstract and geometrical element. 8 Kargon suggests that the increasing abstraction of spatial geometry and greater technical or material determinism, were both essential in engaging with Mendelsohn's interpretation of landscape as a source of the architect's emotion.…”
Section: Drawing Lines Framing Views Forming Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 He argues that Mendelsohn reversed the romantic relationship between landscape and the architect's vision by framing it as a primarily artificial, abstract and geometrical element. 8 Kargon suggests that the increasing abstraction of spatial geometry and greater technical or material determinism, were both essential in engaging with Mendelsohn's interpretation of landscape as a source of the architect's emotion.…”
Section: Drawing Lines Framing Views Forming Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of representation in architecture was not itself the subject of a 'special issue', but 'Constructing the interior' (2004) and 'Visualising the city' (2006) largely followed this theme. 24 Three studies of modern architecture cast a new perspective on modernist paradigms: whether Mendlesohn's 'artefactual landscape' examined by Jeremy Kargon, Richard Difford's investigation of the expansive space of Le Corbusier's Pavillon de l'Esprit Nouveau or Claire Zimmerman's sophisticated purchase on the concept of a 'Photographic Modern Architecture', 25 exploring the ambivalent relationship between the two disciplines. Now subsumed in a book, 26 this last raises the question of our view of republishing 'superseded' papers.…”
Section: Content and Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%