Scientific Pollyannaism 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15982-5_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critics and Critiques of Scientific Pollyannaism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this critique, psychology contributes to the reinforcement and dominance of neoliberal systems, which place the responsibility on individuals for generating positive outcomes in their lives, while attributing blame when negative circumstances arise ( Boyle, 2022 ). Psychological techniques such as mindfulness have been commercialized for financial gain (e.g., ‘McMindfulness’, Purser, 2019 ) while the field of positive psychology has been likened to ‘glad games’ that Pollyanna played to cope with loss, abuse and prejudice, diverting attention away from underlying systemic issues, a critique referred to as ‘scientific Pollyanna-ism’ ( Yakushko, 2019 ). Related criticisms point out that research on wellbeing has disregarded non-Western approaches ( Bednarek, 2024 ) which emphasize the inter-relatedness between people, their communities and the more than human world.…”
Section: Toward a Transdisciplinary Theory Of Wellbeingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this critique, psychology contributes to the reinforcement and dominance of neoliberal systems, which place the responsibility on individuals for generating positive outcomes in their lives, while attributing blame when negative circumstances arise ( Boyle, 2022 ). Psychological techniques such as mindfulness have been commercialized for financial gain (e.g., ‘McMindfulness’, Purser, 2019 ) while the field of positive psychology has been likened to ‘glad games’ that Pollyanna played to cope with loss, abuse and prejudice, diverting attention away from underlying systemic issues, a critique referred to as ‘scientific Pollyanna-ism’ ( Yakushko, 2019 ). Related criticisms point out that research on wellbeing has disregarded non-Western approaches ( Bednarek, 2024 ) which emphasize the inter-relatedness between people, their communities and the more than human world.…”
Section: Toward a Transdisciplinary Theory Of Wellbeingmentioning
confidence: 99%