2021
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01549-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critically ill COVID-19 patients in Africa: it is time for quality registry data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was key as ventilator availability and critical care capacity was stretched globally, with particular concern in Uganda and other LMICs with limited critical care capacity (1,19). The availability of CPAP in Uganda and other LMICs, is unfortunately severely limited, even outside of the pandemic (25). There is very little literature on use of CPAP in adults in Uganda to gauge its level and distribution of use, but there are a number of barriers to its implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was key as ventilator availability and critical care capacity was stretched globally, with particular concern in Uganda and other LMICs with limited critical care capacity (1,19). The availability of CPAP in Uganda and other LMICs, is unfortunately severely limited, even outside of the pandemic (25). There is very little literature on use of CPAP in adults in Uganda to gauge its level and distribution of use, but there are a number of barriers to its implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with other pressing needs competing for already limited funds, a timeline for developing such registries is impossible to predict. Initiatives, such as the Crit Care Africa project funded by the UK government to collect COVID-19 data in the region, are encouraging 21 . However, with the COVID-19 pandemic transitioning to endemic status in many developed countries, it is unclear whether donors will remain incentivized to fund such initiatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HR for death in ICU compared with HDU was 3.7 (95% CI, 3.1-4.5; p < 0.001). Duration of IMV for intubated patients was 7 days (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). Median length of stay in critical care was 2 days (1-5), being shorter in the HDU as compared with ICUs (2 [1][2][3][4]…”
Section: Patient Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%