2003
DOI: 10.1002/macp.200390107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critically Evaluated Rate Coefficients for Free‐Radical Polymerization, 4

Abstract: a Part 1-3: cf. ref. [2][3][4] bThe publication of this article has been accelerated because of its topical or highly competitive nature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
122
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(61 reference statements)
8
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, pulsed‐laser polymerization (PLP) with molecular‐weight distribution (MWD) analysis of the resulting polymer by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) has become the method of choice for the evaluation of the propagation rate coefficient, k p , in free radical polymerization. The PLP‐SEC method developed by Olaj et al1 has been applied successfully to many monomers2,3 and has resulted in IUPAC benchmark values for styrene4 and methacrylates 5–7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, pulsed‐laser polymerization (PLP) with molecular‐weight distribution (MWD) analysis of the resulting polymer by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) has become the method of choice for the evaluation of the propagation rate coefficient, k p , in free radical polymerization. The PLP‐SEC method developed by Olaj et al1 has been applied successfully to many monomers2,3 and has resulted in IUPAC benchmark values for styrene4 and methacrylates 5–7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a lot of effort has been devoted to correlate k p and k t to the degree of conversion, molecular weight, free volume or chain-end mobility [8,14,27,28,40,43,[64][65][66][67]. These fundamental approaches could not be applied successfully to the case of non-isothermal conditions, which are instead commonly used in the industrial practice.…”
Section: Kinetic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, PLP combined with analysis of the resulting polymer molecular weight distribution (MWD) by size‐exclusion chromatography (SEC) provides a direct estimate of k p , the propagation rate coefficient. This PLP‐SEC experimental technique, pioneered by Olaj and coworkers,7,8 has emerged as the method of choice for studying free‐radical propagation kinetics, as documented in a series of benchmark papers for styrene,9 methacrylates,10–12 and butyl acrylate13 by an IUPAC working party studying free‐radical polymerization kinetics. Coote and Davis14 have also applied the technique to the study of propagation kinetics for a series of 4‐ X ‐styrene ( X = methoxy, methyl, fluoro, chloro, and bromo) monomers in the temperature range of 20–40 °C, an effort closely related to the work described in this publication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With known values for t 0 and [ M ], Equation (1) yields a direct estimate of k p . Consistency checks for reliable values are the occurrence of a secondary inflection point located at twice the molecular weight of the first inflection point, and the invariance of measured k p with experimental parameters such as laser pulse repetition rate and energy, and photoinitiator type and concentration 11,12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation