2019
DOI: 10.1177/1474904118824229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical viewpoints on the Bologna Process in Europe: Can we do otherwise?

Abstract: The starting point for this inductive study is to determine, through a search of studies, what critical viewpoints in terms of research are delivered, based on experiences, observations and evaluation, concerning the Bologna Process over time? The aim is to present a description using a thematic analysis based on data from 38 papers (2004–2016) that reveal the critical reasoning behind the research. The reasoning is critical in the sense that various authors have elaborated on and problematized aspects of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…When leaving the micro-sociological perspective behind, we also take into account macro-sociological structures which are relevant for student engagement in relation to recognition, as we do not fully understand the complex interplay between personal and institutional influences on student engagement yet (Kahu and Nelson 2018). In recent years, the Bologna curricula reform has often been criticised with regard to its effects on higher education (Wihlborg 2019) and has influenced the possibilities of student engagement recognition as it seems to have left only a marginal space for formal validation of student engagement. This is especially relevant for curricula in social sciences as they focus on social, civic or community-related content and can only to a limited extent offer students practical opportunities for engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When leaving the micro-sociological perspective behind, we also take into account macro-sociological structures which are relevant for student engagement in relation to recognition, as we do not fully understand the complex interplay between personal and institutional influences on student engagement yet (Kahu and Nelson 2018). In recent years, the Bologna curricula reform has often been criticised with regard to its effects on higher education (Wihlborg 2019) and has influenced the possibilities of student engagement recognition as it seems to have left only a marginal space for formal validation of student engagement. This is especially relevant for curricula in social sciences as they focus on social, civic or community-related content and can only to a limited extent offer students practical opportunities for engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to 2015, European higher education policy has been focused on the convergence of higher education systems, with the objective of making Europe the leading knowledge economy in the world [26,27]. The mobility of students, academics and knowledge was projected as necessary to this objective, leading to the provisions of the Bologna and Lisbon processes [28][29][30].…”
Section: International Insight and Vision In The European Higher Educmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fram kemur í máli Páls Skúlasonar (2014) að áhrif Bolognaferlisins vegi þungt þegar horft er á þróun háskóla á Íslandi. Bolognaferlið, sem er hluti af samraemingaraðferð (e. Open Method of Coordination) Evrópusambandsins (Wihlborg 2019), hófst árið 1999 með undirritun yfirlýsingar fulltrúa 29 Evrópulanda um aukið samstarf háskóla í Evrópu. Samstarfsaðilum hefur frá þeim tíma fjölgað í 45 (Marqand 2018).…”
Section: Stjórnmál and Stjórnsýslaunclassified
“…Þó hugmyndafraeði Bolognaferlisins sé talin hafa sterka skírskotun til hugmynda um lýðraeðislegt hlutverk háskóla hefur hún jafnframt verið gagnrýnd fyrir að vera afkvaemi annarra hugmynda (Beach & Puaca 2014; Wihlborg 2019). Samkvaemt rannsókn Wihlborg (2019) var ferlið byggt á sterkri orðraeðu markaðshyggju og þekkingarhagkerfis og einkenndist innleiðing þess af ferlum í anda nýfrjálshyggju. Í því samhengi nefnir hún atriði eins og viðskiptavina-og vöruvaeðingu menntunar og stýringu og stöðlun í formi gaeðakerfa.…”
Section: Stjórnmál and Stjórnsýslaunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation