2017
DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2017.1283751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Urban Infrastructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In justifying public transport projects, project advocates promote economic benefits over the alleged social benefits (Steele & Legacy, 2017). While the intended benefits (e.g.…”
Section: Social Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In justifying public transport projects, project advocates promote economic benefits over the alleged social benefits (Steele & Legacy, 2017). While the intended benefits (e.g.…”
Section: Social Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of special issues have appeared in scholarly journals, creating an abundant amount of literature on megaprojects, for example, the The Past and Present of Megaprojects Policy and Research (2017), and the International Journal of Managing Projects in Business (2018). It is especially encouraging to see that megaprojects have taken a more prominent role in management and organization studies (Van Marrewijk, 2015) as well as economic geography (Grabher & Thiel, 2014;Rasagam, Engman, Gurcanlar, & Fernandes, 2014) and urban planning (Steele, 2017). Despite the impressive and important progresswith a number of achievements made related to better stories (more empirical examples, intriguing case studies, etc.)…”
Section: The Progress Of Megaproject Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transport policies determine several socio-spatial impacts that enhance or impede the public acceptance and therefore the political feasibility of certain options. These include a wide range of features, such as the amount and distribution of the costs and benefits generated by each measure [23,24]; the conflicts generated by a new transport policy, due to its externalities or to the disruptions in it generates [25,26]; or the perceptions associated with certain (often infrastructural) interventions, especially in terms of "need" and "prestige," as well as of their contribution to the "legacy" of the decision maker who promotes them [27,28]. These are just some of the social impacts generated by transport policies, and that the main evaluative techniques often struggle to consider [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%