2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical thrust force predictions during drilling: Analytical modeling and X-ray tomography quantification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolution of the force as a function of the displacement is similar to those observed in the literature for punching tests conducted on twist drills; however, the maximum level of the recorded forces is different. 36,41 This can be explained by the local contact condition tool/CFRP being different resulting in different load distributions for a core drill as compared to twist drill.
Figure 8.Punching axial force with different number of plies under the tool.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evolution of the force as a function of the displacement is similar to those observed in the literature for punching tests conducted on twist drills; however, the maximum level of the recorded forces is different. 36,41 This can be explained by the local contact condition tool/CFRP being different resulting in different load distributions for a core drill as compared to twist drill.
Figure 8.Punching axial force with different number of plies under the tool.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the validation of the proposed CTF model predictions, CFRP specimens with blind holes have been subjected to punching tests as per the procedure outlined by Saoudi et al. 36 and Zitoune and Collombet. 41 Foremost, the total thickness of the laminate and the total number of the plies were measured in order to determine the average ply thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delamination phenomenon is closely influenced by the drilling process parameters [15][16][17][18][19][20]. In [21,22], an excessively high thrust force is reported as the main process parameter responsible for catastrophic tool failure and extended delamination damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their low interlayer bonding strength and anisotropism [1], CFRP are easily damaged in machining and are typically difficult to process. The most common matrix in carbon fibre composites is thermosetting epoxy resin bonded tightly with carbon fibre; however, epoxy resin may be softened, aged and chemically decomposed under certain temperatures [2], which further causes the failure of CFRP-containing parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%