Critical thinking skills in nursing students: comparison of simulation‐based performance with metrics

Abstract

Aim This paper is a report of an examination of the relationship between metrics of critical thinking skills and performance in simulated clinical scenarios. Background Paper and pencil assessments are commonly used to assess critical thinking but may not reflect simulated performance. Methods In 2007, a convenience sample of 36 nursing students participated in measurement of critical thinking skills and simulation-based performance using videotaped vignettes, high-fidelity human simulation, the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory and California Critical Thinking Skills Test. Simulation- based performance was rated as ‘meeting’ or ‘not meeting’ overall expectations. Test scores were categorized as strong, average, or weak. Results Most (75·0%) students did not meet overall performance expectations using videotaped vignettes or high-fidelity human simulation; most difficulty related to problem recognition and reporting findings to the physician. There was no difference between overall performance based on method of assessment (P = 0·277). More students met subcategory expectations for initiating nursing interventions (P ≤ 0·001) using high-fidelity human simulation. The relationship between video-taped vignette performance and critical thinking disposition or skills scores was not statistically significant, except for problem recognition and overall critical thinking skills scores (Cramer’s V = 0·444, P = 0·029). There was a statistically significant relationship between overall high-fidelity human simulation performance and overall critical thinking disposition scores (Cramer’s V = 0·413, P = 0·047). Conclusion Students’ performance reflected difficulty meeting expectations in simulated clinical scenarios. High-fidelity human simulation performance appeared to approximate scores on metrics of critical thinking best. Further research is needed to determine if simulation-based performance correlates with critical thinking skills in the clinical setting.

Development of Crisis Resource Management Skills: A Literature Review

“…According to Fero et al (2010), key elements within the multiple definitions of problem solving include "an individual's ability to seek and comprehend relevant information and an association with knowledge, reasoning, cognitive skills, identification, and exploration of alternative frames of reference" (p. 2183). It is suggested that high-fidelity simulation (HFS) learning offers an ideal environment for the development of problem-solving skills.…”

Simulation: Pre-briefing Preparation, Clinical Judgment and Reflection. What is the Connection?

“…Several studies have explored simulation [2][3][4].There have been studies exploring how well simulation prepares students for clinical judgment development [2,5,6] yet studies are still needed to explorethe reflective process that is intertwined with clinical reasoning to further enhance knowledge retention. Clinical judgment is quite complex, and necessitates a flexible and distinct ability to recognize undefined clinical information, interpret its meaning and respond appropriately [7,8].In conjunction with clinical judgment is reflection on practice which is critical for the development of clinical knowledge and improvement in clinical reasoning [5,7].Reflecting upon one's experience promotes learning, and a guide for reflection using the clinical judgment model was developed to promote students' reflective writing to encourage critical thinking, knowledge transfer, transformation, metacognition, and exploration of emotional aspects of situations encountered in clinical experiences [9,10].…”

Adding context to a simulation module for leadership and management baccalaureate nursing students

“…Students' perception of communication with the client and significant others, prioritization, decision making, and clinical judgment also improved after simulated learning experiences [8,[14][15][16] . Improvement in student use of critical thinking skills has also been reported in the literature [17][18][19] .…”