Critical Thinking as Discourse

Abstract

Less than it is an individual ability or skill, critical thinking is a dialogic practice people engage in and commit to, initially interactively and then in interiorized form with the other only implicit. An argument depends for its meaning on how others respond. In advancing arguments, well-practiced thinkers anticipate their defeasibility as a consequence of others’ objections, in addition to envisioning their own potential rebuttals. Whether in external or interiorized form, the dialogic process creates something new, while itself undergoing development. This perspective may be useful in sharpening the definition of the construct of critical thinking and in so doing help to bring together the largely separate strands of work examining it as a theoretical construct, a measurable skill, and an educational objective. Implications for education follow. How might critical thinking as a shared practice be engaged within educational settings in ways that will best support its development? One step is to privilege frequent practice of direct peer-to-peer discourse. A second is to take advantage of the leveraging power of dialogue as a bridge to individual argument – one affording students’ argumentative writing a well-envisioned audience and purpose. Illustrations of this bridging power are presented. Finally, implications for assessment of critical thinking are noted and a case made for the value of commitment to a high standard of critical thinking as a shared and interactive practice.

Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement With Scientific Information—A Literature Review

“…Apparently, recognizing multiperspectivity does not automatically mean one can apply sophisticated strategies when evaluating opposing views or arguments. Based on several empirical findings, Kuhn (2019) addresses this point by suggesting that understanding multivariable causality is a link toward evaluating and integrating multiple perspectives. Following this approach, OESI should include information-(or knowledge-) seeking activities for identifying and negotiating the multiple factors that can cause a phenomenon and to bring them into ongoing discussion.…”

Evaluation of the Educational Drama as an Innovative Method to be Adopted by Teachers in Order to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Primary School

“…Ennis, one of the theorists who has thoroughly researched critical thinking, defines it as "a reasonable reflective process focusing on deciding what to believe or do" (Ennis, 2018: 166). Nevertheless, this is apparently a definition that needs further investigation and clarification (Kuhn, 2019).…”

Desarrollo de Pensamiento Crítico en Ingeniería: una experiencia formato Artículo-Conferencia

“…Para Facione [10] son habilidades cognitivas que dispone la persona cuando interpreta, analiza, evalúa, infiere, explica y autoregula. Además, Kuhn [11] hace referencia a Ennis quien lo considera como un pensamiento reflexivo, razonable centrado en decidir qué creer o hacer.…”