2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical thickness as a function of the indium molar fraction in cubic InXGa1-XN and the influence in the growth of nanostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the cubic phase, reports on the optical properties of bulk c-InxGa1-xN layers with indium contents above x(In) = 0.25 are sparse. In general, our emission peaks appear to be at lower energies than those reported for cubic nanostructures with an equal or higher presumed indium content [13][14][15] . A more detailed analysis of the optical and electrical properties is currently under the way and will follow in a forthcoming publication.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…For the cubic phase, reports on the optical properties of bulk c-InxGa1-xN layers with indium contents above x(In) = 0.25 are sparse. In general, our emission peaks appear to be at lower energies than those reported for cubic nanostructures with an equal or higher presumed indium content [13][14][15] . A more detailed analysis of the optical and electrical properties is currently under the way and will follow in a forthcoming publication.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This value is slightly lower than the bowing of the emission energy in hexagonal In x Ga 1– x N ( b ≈ 2.8 eV). , Compared to other cubic In x Ga 1– x N epilayers, the emission energies reported here for low indium content ( x (In) < 0.3) align rather well with other bulk-like thin film samples. , For larger alloy compositions (0.3 < x (In) < 0.5), reports on the optical properties of c-In x Ga 1– x N are sparse. We observe emission peaks at significantly lower energies than those of other c-In x Ga 1– x N layers or multi quantum wells. The most recent study, ref , determines a significantly smaller bowing of b = 1.4 eV by ellipsometry measurements, which might be caused by the somewhat higher energy values that are measured in the very highly alloyed samples with x (In) > 0.9 and the lack of data for x (In) > 0.5 (see Figure b). The discrepancies may also arise from the fact that our emissions may be caused by recombinations that are localized in the potential valleys of the alloys, which ellipsometry may be less sensitive to.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%