2022
DOI: 10.1002/cepa.1781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Temperature of Load Bearing LSF Walls Under Fire

Abstract: Light Steel Frame (LSF) walls are widely used in building structures, used as partition walls and load bearing walls. The LSF is usually protected by layers of homogeneous plates or composite plates, with or without insulation materials in the cavity. This investigation presents the experimental and the simulation results of composite LSF walls in reduced scale and full scale, based on variable load levels (20 to 80%). The numerical model is validated with experimental results, at reduced and full scale, both … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the validation of the full-scale model, and because this load-bearing model considers the wall submitted to fire from both sides, the standard fire ISO834 has been applied for the bulk temperature of the furnace side, while a different fire scenario (lower bulk temperature) has been applied on the other side (due to the limitation of the experimental testing facilities). Two numerical techniques have been used, based on our previous experience to validate 3D numerical models [19,20]. For the reduced-scale model, an extra boundary condition for convection and radiation is considered inside the cavity, based on the bulk cavity temperature measured during the experimental tests developed in the LTFW with a single and a double cladding system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the validation of the full-scale model, and because this load-bearing model considers the wall submitted to fire from both sides, the standard fire ISO834 has been applied for the bulk temperature of the furnace side, while a different fire scenario (lower bulk temperature) has been applied on the other side (due to the limitation of the experimental testing facilities). Two numerical techniques have been used, based on our previous experience to validate 3D numerical models [19,20]. For the reduced-scale model, an extra boundary condition for convection and radiation is considered inside the cavity, based on the bulk cavity temperature measured during the experimental tests developed in the LTFW with a single and a double cladding system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%