2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.69.184501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical temperature for the two-dimensional attractive Hubbard model

Abstract: The critical temperature for the attractive Hubbard model on a square lattice is determined from the analysis of two independent quantities, the helicity modulus s and the pairing correlation function P s . These quantities have been calculated through quantum Monte Carlo simulations for lattices up to 18ϫ18, and for several densities, in the intermediate-coupling regime. Imposing the universal-jump condition for an accurately calculated s , together with thorough finite-size scaling analyses ͑in the spirit of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

14
106
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
14
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find the BKT transition temperature in the Lieb lattice to be k B T c;BKT ¼ πℏ 2 D s ðT c;BKT Þ=8 ¼ 0.133 J [45] at the optimal coupling U ≈ 4 J [ Fig. 4(a)], to be compared with the quantum Monte Carlo estimate k B T c;BKT ∼ 0.10-0.13 J at U ¼ 4 J for the 2D simple square lattice [66] (for three dimensions see Ref. [67]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find the BKT transition temperature in the Lieb lattice to be k B T c;BKT ¼ πℏ 2 D s ðT c;BKT Þ=8 ¼ 0.133 J [45] at the optimal coupling U ≈ 4 J [ Fig. 4(a)], to be compared with the quantum Monte Carlo estimate k B T c;BKT ∼ 0.10-0.13 J at U ¼ 4 J for the 2D simple square lattice [66] (for three dimensions see Ref. [67]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At lower temperatures, T ≈ J/4 = t 2 /U , there is a second peak associated with magnetic ordering (pair coherence). Interestingly, in two dimensions, this two peak structure appears to survive even down to weak coupling where the two energy scales merge, [28] in contrast to the behavior in one dimension, [36,37,38,39,40] and in the paramagnetic phase in infinite dimensions. [41,42,43] What happens to this behavior when disorder is introduced, specifically when U = 0 sites are inserted, as in …”
Section: Specific Heatmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…T c decreases gradually thereafter. [26,27] There is some debate as to the exact value of the maximal T c , with estimates [28] in the range 0.05t < T c,max < 0.2t. The problem lies with the rather large system sizes needed to study Kosterlitz-Thouless transitions numerically, and hence to benchmark the accuracy of the approximate analytic calculations.…”
Section: The Model and Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly powerful method of exploring finitetemperature properties is the hybridization-expansion CTQMC method, 26,27) which enables us to study the attractive Hubbard model in both the weak-and strongcoupling regimes. 28) In the study, by varying the ratio of the bandwidths r ¼ D # =D " at a fixed D " ¼ 1 (energy unit), we proceed to discuss how mass imbalance affects lowtemperature properties.In a mass balanced system (r ¼ 1), low-energy properties have been studied in one dimension, [29][30][31][32] two dimensions, 33,34) and infinite dimensions. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] It is known that the DW and SF states are degenerate on a bipartite lattice in two and higher dimensions at half filling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a mass balanced system (r ¼ 1), low-energy properties have been studied in one dimension, [29][30][31][32] two dimensions, 33,34) and infinite dimensions. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] It is known that the DW and SF states are degenerate on a bipartite lattice in two and higher dimensions at half filling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%