2023
DOI: 10.4236/blr.2023.141023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Studies of the Land Mafia Practices: Evidence in Indonesia

Abstract: This study aims to present an overview of land mafia practices in Indonesia which raises problems of land cases, land dispute conflicts that lead to Staat Van Oorlog en Beleg (SOB) or a state of emergency. The actions and modus operandi of the land mafia in Indonesia are carried out both individually and in groups based on bad intentions involving politicians, criminals, property traders and corrupt government officials. The research methodology used is normative law with a qualitative analysis approach. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of straightforwardness brought about by restricted information and data in regards to land control and proprietorship, as well as the absence of straightforwardness of data accessible locally, is one of the reasons for the underlying development of land debates. [3] Land ownership in Indonesia itself, if traced from its history, can be divided into two periods, namely land ownership before and after the promulgation of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). Land ownership in the period before the promulgation of the UUPA gave rise to a legal dualism governing land in Indonesia, on the one hand, Dutch colonial land law applied or adhered to the Western Civil Law system, and on the one hand, the Customary Law system also applied which applies to native people who do not have written evidence, which is often called customary land or ulayat land.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of straightforwardness brought about by restricted information and data in regards to land control and proprietorship, as well as the absence of straightforwardness of data accessible locally, is one of the reasons for the underlying development of land debates. [3] Land ownership in Indonesia itself, if traced from its history, can be divided into two periods, namely land ownership before and after the promulgation of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). Land ownership in the period before the promulgation of the UUPA gave rise to a legal dualism governing land in Indonesia, on the one hand, Dutch colonial land law applied or adhered to the Western Civil Law system, and on the one hand, the Customary Law system also applied which applies to native people who do not have written evidence, which is often called customary land or ulayat land.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%