2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10808-005-0144-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Stresses in Spalling and Dynamic Rupture of Metals

Abstract: Results of dynamic rupture tests of a series of metals obtained using a composite Hopkinson bar and shock-wave loading of plane specimens are described. It is shown that the actual rupture strength at a strain rate of 5 · 10 3 sec −1 is very close to the spall strength at higher strain rates. Results of testing the same metals using a composite Hopkinson bar within a temperature range of 20-350 • C are given.Despite numerous papers that have been published on the strength of materials under shock-wave loading … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, this result is due to differences in the geometric dimensions of the samples. The value S kd = 3.3 GPa obtained in the present paper is 1.5-2.2 times greater than the values of S kd obtained in [9] using the split Hopkinson pressure bar method at the same strain rate for steels of different classes. However, in this case, the geometric dimensions of the samples differed.…”
Section: Results Of Tensile Testscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Apparently, this result is due to differences in the geometric dimensions of the samples. The value S kd = 3.3 GPa obtained in the present paper is 1.5-2.2 times greater than the values of S kd obtained in [9] using the split Hopkinson pressure bar method at the same strain rate for steels of different classes. However, in this case, the geometric dimensions of the samples differed.…”
Section: Results Of Tensile Testscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…The characteristics for the macrostructural level in copper and aluminum alloy were determined using the Hopkinson split bar technique (the key parameters are given in [17]), and the data for Armco iron are taken from [12]. Once the dynamic breaking strength σ b.d.…”
Section: Computational-experimental Validation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%