2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical stress for twinning nucleation in CrCoNi-based medium and high entropy alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical twinning stress (σ tw ) is described as an equivalent stress of importance to form sufficient stacking faults followed by the measureable deformation twins 8,37 . Several theoretical or phenomenological approaches have determined the σ tw using TEM 8,9 , neutron diffraction 12 or first-principle calculation based on energy barriers of stacking/twin faults 10,37 . It has been estimated for the CrCoNi alloy as 790 ± 100 MPa using TEM 9 , 890 MPa by first-principle calculation 10 , and 680-770 MPa by a numerical model by Steinmetz et al 36…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The critical twinning stress (σ tw ) is described as an equivalent stress of importance to form sufficient stacking faults followed by the measureable deformation twins 8,37 . Several theoretical or phenomenological approaches have determined the σ tw using TEM 8,9 , neutron diffraction 12 or first-principle calculation based on energy barriers of stacking/twin faults 10,37 . It has been estimated for the CrCoNi alloy as 790 ± 100 MPa using TEM 9 , 890 MPa by first-principle calculation 10 , and 680-770 MPa by a numerical model by Steinmetz et al 36…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dissociating a perfect dislocation into Shockley partial dislocations and considered as a surface tension pulling the partials, which is inversely proportional to the equilibrium distance between two partials 14 . The key issue of the CrCoNi MEA is the low SFE, which creates a wide stacking fault ribbon limiting the cross slip deformation mode and provides the superior mechanical properties by the dominant deformation twinning [6][7][8][9][10][11] . Up to date, Laplanche et al 9 reported the SFE of 22 ± 4 mJ/m 2 in CrCoNi MEA, which is ~25% lower than CrCoNiFeMn HEA (30 ± 4 mJ/m 2 ) and Liu et al reported as 18 ± 4 mJ/m 2 in CrCoNi MEA and 26.5 ± 4.5 mJ/ m 2 in CrCoNiFeMn HEA using TEM 2,11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The f 1 (w c1 ) and f 2 (w c1 ) values for large d are entirely fixed by σ, a value roughly scaling with the inverse of the unstable stacking fault energy (USFE), σ ∼ γ USF[52]; accurate estimate of σ would be required. For smaller separation distances, d and σ both induce variations in f 1 (w c ) and f 1 (w c ), meaning that in these cases the knowledge of both SFE and USFE is important for the strength.Discussing now specifically the case of HEAs, both experiments and ab initio calculations estimated low γ SF / large d values[53][54][55] for the Co-Cr-Fe-Ni-Mn class of HEAs, suggesting that the exact knowledge of d would not be necessary for HEA strength at low to intermediate temperature. Concerning σ, a value of 1.5b was proposed[27] as a typical value resulting from atomistic simulations of model EAM HEAs and various elemental alloys, and provided good agreement with experimental strengths[27,39,40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the EMTO method and the CPA for the elastic properties and planar fault energies of random alloys including HEAs was demonstrated previously [48][49][50][51]. Table 2: Material parameters of the five bcc HEAs, arranged in order of increasing VEC, used in the LEFM analysis: the elastic constants (in units of GPa), and the relaxed surface energies and USF energies for selected fault planes (in units of J/m 2 ).…”
Section: Details Of the Density-functional Theory Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 84%