2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40120-019-00166-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Steps to be Taken into Consideration Before Quantification of β-Amyloid and Tau Isoforms in Blood can be Implemented in a Clinical Environment

Abstract: This review aims to document difficulties, limitations, and pitfalls when considering protein analysis in blood samples. It proposes an improved workflow for design, development, and validation of (immuno)assays for blood proteins, without providing reflections on a potential hypothesis of the origin of protein mismetabolism and deposition. There is a special focus on assay development for quantification of b-amyloid (Ab) and tau in blood for diagnostic use or for integration in clinical trials in the field of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increased performance of the ratios has been linked to the correction for interindividual differences in total Aβ production in Aβ 1–42 /Aβ 1–40 and might result from capturing multiple AD dimensions in Aβ 1–42 /t-tau. Besides, the reduction in analytical confounding factors that typically arise in protein analyses, such as the presence of various blood cells, might also play an important role in the increased performance [ 38 ]. The lower specificity and PPV of plasma Aβ 1–42 /t-tau compared to plasma Aβ 1–42 /Aβ 1–40 in the CN subgroup but not in the aMCI subgroup might argue for the use of plasma Aβ 1–42 /Aβ 1–40 in prescreening of CN subjects, while plasma Aβ 1–42 /t-tau is a potential alternative in later AD stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increased performance of the ratios has been linked to the correction for interindividual differences in total Aβ production in Aβ 1–42 /Aβ 1–40 and might result from capturing multiple AD dimensions in Aβ 1–42 /t-tau. Besides, the reduction in analytical confounding factors that typically arise in protein analyses, such as the presence of various blood cells, might also play an important role in the increased performance [ 38 ]. The lower specificity and PPV of plasma Aβ 1–42 /t-tau compared to plasma Aβ 1–42 /Aβ 1–40 in the CN subgroup but not in the aMCI subgroup might argue for the use of plasma Aβ 1–42 /Aβ 1–40 in prescreening of CN subjects, while plasma Aβ 1–42 /t-tau is a potential alternative in later AD stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly sensitive plasma immunoassays for ptau181 20,21 and ptau217 22–25 published beyond our search date show various associations with AD and should be included in future updates to this systematic review. Pre‐analytical variables must also be standardized 116,117 as they have been shown to influence measurement of plasma Aβ 118 and were posited to account for differences in results between cohorts, complicating the establishment of a common cutoff value 60 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives potential for plasma Aβ detection as a simple and minimally invasive way for early diagnosis of AD. [10] The plasma level of Aβ 1-42 (~20 pg/mL) is considerably lower than that in CSF. [11] At the present stage, AD molecular diagnosis has nevertheless not reached the expected specificity and sensitivity (< 90 %).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%