1979
DOI: 10.1063/1.326642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical-state model for the determination of critical currents in disk-shaped superconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two factors reducing the PM response for the samples with increased thickness: (1) characteristic scale of a screened field H scr is j c d [34], implying the need of higher J PM c to compensate increased J Sh c , and (2) thick films require more energy to resettle the pinned fluxes towards the center. These thickness tendencies are consistent with the magnetization behavior observed for thin superconducting films in orthogonal magnetic fields [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Behavior Of Pme Under Different Conditionssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are two factors reducing the PM response for the samples with increased thickness: (1) characteristic scale of a screened field H scr is j c d [34], implying the need of higher J PM c to compensate increased J Sh c , and (2) thick films require more energy to resettle the pinned fluxes towards the center. These thickness tendencies are consistent with the magnetization behavior observed for thin superconducting films in orthogonal magnetic fields [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Behavior Of Pme Under Different Conditionssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This value is more than one order smaller than j c obtained directly from transport measurements, j c = j 0K c (1 − T /T c ) ≈ 2 × 10 7 A/m 2 , where j 0K c = 6 × 10 7 A/m 2 (see Table 1). A possible source of the difference is a contribution to the azimuthal critical current from a gradient of the radial field along the axial direction z, ∂H r /∂z [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Behavior Of Pme Under Different Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact was confirmed by a number of experiments performed on both conventional [28] and high temperature superconductors [29,30]. The experiments were performed by magneto-optic technique [29] or by using scanning Hall-probes [28,30] on thin conventional superconducting discs [28], HTS films [29] or thin single crystals [30], in the external magnetic field perpendicular to their surfaces. Until now, many attempts have been undertaken to solve the problem of the magnetic field and screening current distribution in superconductors with non-zero demagnetizing factors [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Calculations of the magnetic response of finite superconductors in the critical state including demagnetizing effects have been recently presented for strips [6] and cylinders [7][8][9], following previous works on very thin strips [10] and disks [11]. Very recently, Shantsev et al [12] have discussed important features of the effects of demagnetizing fields in the hysteresis loop.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%