2006
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00320-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical-state effects on microwave losses in type-II superconductors

Abstract: Abstract. We discuss the microwave energy losses in superconductors in the critical state. The field-induced variations of the surface resistance are determined, in the framework of the Coffey and Clem model, by taking into account the distribution of the vortex magnetic field inside the sample. It is shown that the effects of the critical state cannot generally be disregarded to account for the experimental data. Results obtained in bulk niobium at low temperatures are quantitatively justified.PACS. 74.25.Ha … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microwave losses induced by static magnetic fields have been investigated by several authors [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]32,33]. At low temperatures and for applied magnetic fields lower enough than the upper critical field, the main contribution arises from the fluxon motion; however, it has been pointed out that a noticeable contribution can arise from the presence of normal fluid, especially at temperatures near T c and for magnetic fields of the same order of H c2 ðTÞ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microwave losses induced by static magnetic fields have been investigated by several authors [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]32,33]. At low temperatures and for applied magnetic fields lower enough than the upper critical field, the main contribution arises from the fluxon motion; however, it has been pointed out that a noticeable contribution can arise from the presence of normal fluid, especially at temperatures near T c and for magnetic fields of the same order of H c2 ðTÞ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When fluxons are in the critical state, the assumption of uniform B is no longer valid and the CC theory does not correctly describe the field-induced variations of R s . Recently, we have investigated the field-induced variations of the mw surface resistance in superconductors in the critical state and have accounted for the magnetic hysteresis in the R s ðH 0 Þ curves [32,33]. The details of the procedure we have followed to account for the experimental results of Fig.…”
Section: ð1þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microwave losses induced by static magnetic fields have been investigated by several authors [27,28,29,30,31,32,42,48]. At low temperatures and for applied magnetic fields lower enough than the upper critical field, the main contribution arises from the fluxon motion; however, it has been pointed out that a noticeable contribution can arise from the presence of normal fluid, especially at temperatures near T c and for magnetic fields of the same order of H c2 (T ).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a), the effects of the nonuniform B distribution on R s are particularly enhanced because in the two surfaces of the sample normal to the external magnetic field the mw current and fields penetrate along the fluxon axis and, consequently, the mw losses involve the whole vortex lattice. However, in this case, one can easily take into account the non-uniform B distribution by calculating a proper averaged value of R s over the whole sample as follows [42,48] …”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coffey and Clem (CC) have elaborated a comprehensive theory, in the framework of the two-fluid model of superconductivity [24], under the assumption that the induction field, B, is uniform within the AC-field penetration depth; so, it is valid for applied fields higher enough than the first-penetration field whenever the effects of the critical state can be neglected [36]. On the other hand, we do not observe magnetic hysteresis except in the field range in which the field-induced mw losses are mainly due to the presence of weak links.…”
Section: Field-induced Variation Of Rsmentioning
confidence: 99%