Critical standpoint: Leaders of color advancing racial equality in predominantly white organizations

Abstract

Organizations are often core sites for the production and perpetuation of social inequality. Although the United States is becoming more racially diverse, organizational elites remain disproportionately white, and this mismatch contributes to increasing racial inequality. This article examines whether and how leaders of color within predominantly white organizations can help their organizations address racial inequality. Our analysis uses data from a national study of politically oriented civic organizations and ethnographic fieldwork within one predominantly white organization. We draw on institutional work research, the outsider‐within concept, and insights from critical whiteness theory to explain how leaders of color can use their position and “critical standpoint” to help guide their organization toward advancing racial equality. The qualitative analysis shows how such leaders, when empowered, help their organization address race internally by (a) providing alternatives to white‐dominated perspectives, (b) developing tools to educate white members about racial inequality, and (c) identifying and addressing barriers to becoming a more racially diverse organization. The qualitative analysis also shows how leaders of color help their organization address race externally by (a) sharing personal narratives about living in a white‐dominated society and (b) brokering collaborations with organizations led by people of color. This research has implications for organizations seeking to promote social equality: Organizational leaders from marginalized status groups can help their organizations address social inequality, if those leaders possess a critical standpoint and sufficient organizational authority.

Gender in nonprofit organizations: A critical review and research agenda

“…This development is, for example, reflected in the establishment of a permanent critical section at ARNOVA, an important conference for scholars in the field of nonprofit studies, and recent call for papers to special issues in this field. There is also an emerging stream of publications that recognize critical perspectives (e.g., Coule et al, 2022; Fulton et al, 2019; Sandberg, 2021). In parallel, it is argued that critical perspectives can provide novel theoretical insights about inequalities within various nonprofit contexts (cf.…”

Institutional Work: A Review and Framework based on Semantic and Thematic Analysis

“…Hampel et al (2017) lament the lack of IW research aimed at 'big' institutions, specifically mentioning gender and race. We found counterexamples (Fulton et al, 2019;Karam & Jamali, 2013) as well as geographic and temporally expansive institutions (Almond, 2015;Hasselbalch, 2016); however, greater incorporation of intersectionality could deepen understanding (Choo & Ferree, 2010).…”

The color of nonprofit leadership: Nonprofits with a CEO of color

“…Achieving racially and ethnically diverse leadership has been one of the most persistent challenges in the sector, and there is a consensus on the importance of board racial diversity (Fulton et al, 2019; LeRoux, 2020). Still, studies find that today's nonprofit boards are far from being racially diverse (Inclusive Boards, 2018; LeRoux, 2020).…”