2014
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical size defects for bone regeneration experiments in rabbit calvariae: systematic review and quality evaluation using ARRIVE guidelines

Abstract: Data on CSDs in rabbit calvariae lack homogeneity. Smaller defects can be considered critical depending on the time of sacrifice. When new diagnostic technologies are used in addition to histomorphometry, these should be applied with caution to facilitate future comparison with other research. The ARRIVE guidelines should be followed in any animal research protocol to improve the homogeneity, comparison and reproducibility between studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The red number at the bottom of each column represents the total score for all manuscripts for each category; bold black letters at the bottom of each column show the maximum possible value for each category size, allocation, numbers analyzed, adverse effects, general applicability/relevance and funding. This also agrees with Schwarz et al (2012), Delgado-Ruiz et al (2014) and Vajgel et al (2014).…”
Section: Quality Assessment Using Arrive Guidelinessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The red number at the bottom of each column represents the total score for all manuscripts for each category; bold black letters at the bottom of each column show the maximum possible value for each category size, allocation, numbers analyzed, adverse effects, general applicability/relevance and funding. This also agrees with Schwarz et al (2012), Delgado-Ruiz et al (2014) and Vajgel et al (2014).…”
Section: Quality Assessment Using Arrive Guidelinessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The manuscripts included for review were evaluated applying the ARRIVE guidelines for assessing in vivo animal experiments Schwarz et al 2012;Vajgel et al 2014) scoring the following items: To assess the quality of a study, each item received a grade following the procedure described by and Schwarz et al (2012); awarding each manuscript with a maximum possible score (MPS) as described by Delgado-Ruiz et al (2014) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of an inverse relationship between marrow area and post‐ablation intramembranous bone volume was unexpected given that defect size is known to influence bone repair and that larger defects heal less well than smaller defects . The lack of correlation with ear punch healing was also unexpected because of the association between ear and cartilage healing recently reported .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femurs were embedded in methylmethacrylate and cut in the coronal plane on a Leica RM2255 microtome to create alternating 4 and 8 μm thick sections . The 4 μm sections were stained using Von Kossa for mineralized tissue and counterstained with tetrachrome for soft tissues . In Experiment 2, calcein (15 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously to all animals on days 5 and 2 prior to sacrifice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%