2014
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.571687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Roles of Interdomain Interactions for Modulatory ATP Binding to Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+-ATPase

Abstract: Background: ATP stimulates dephosphorylation of Ca 2ϩ -ATPase. Results: ATP affinities of intermediate states in the dephosphorylation are altered by certain mutations interfering with interactions between A-, P-, and N-domains. Conclusion: Disruption of ATP modulation by mutation is explained by destabilization of the enzyme-phosphoryl transition state with bound nucleotide. Significance: Mechanisms underlying the modulatory effect of ATP and the importance therein of interdomain bonds are elucidated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect of ATP on the dephosphorylation reaction is reversed when residues bridging the A and N domains in E2∼P are mutated. That is, the E2P ground state becomes relatively more stabilized by ATP than E2∼P, and the dephosphorylation reaction is slowed down ( 19 , 20 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect of ATP on the dephosphorylation reaction is reversed when residues bridging the A and N domains in E2∼P are mutated. That is, the E2P ground state becomes relatively more stabilized by ATP than E2∼P, and the dephosphorylation reaction is slowed down ( 19 , 20 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the SERCA1 ATP-binding site flips between the catalytic (Ca 2+ E1-ATP) and modulatory (E2-ATP) mode (Jensen et al 2006;Clausen et al 2011; Aguayo-Ortiz and Espinoza-Fonseca 2020; Kabashima et al 2020), ATP serves as an interdomain-interaction mediator at various stages of the transport cycle. The majority of amino acid residues involved in ATP binding are almost identical for both the E1 and E2 conformation (Autry et al 2012;Clausen et al 2014;Páez-Pérez et al 2016;de la Cruz-Torres et al 2020).…”
Section: E1mentioning
confidence: 99%