2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-017-0218-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Review of the Hypervib1 Model to Assess Pile Vibro-Drivability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter statement is based on the fact that soil conditions (e.g. large soil reaction) can affect the power consumption, which occurs in vibratory driving due to the vibrator-pile-soil interaction [23] and can even lead to pile refusal [24]. Further, a drop in torsional power consumption is visible for GDP 2 between 50 s to 100 s (4 meters penetration in Fig.…”
Section: Power Input To the Pilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter statement is based on the fact that soil conditions (e.g. large soil reaction) can affect the power consumption, which occurs in vibratory driving due to the vibrator-pile-soil interaction [23] and can even lead to pile refusal [24]. Further, a drop in torsional power consumption is visible for GDP 2 between 50 s to 100 s (4 meters penetration in Fig.…”
Section: Power Input To the Pilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During impact installation, the pile is pushed into the soil using a falling mass. This method more likely causes damage to the pile such as pile buckling [3,4]. In contrast, the vibratory driving method is a cheaper, faster, and less noisy alternative where the pile is driven using an axial periodic motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of non-cohesive soils, the resulting vibration due to the motion forms two different zones. In the zone near the pile shaft, the surrounding soil is loosened, which reduces both the soil resistance and its friction with the pile, making the penetration easier [3]. This small region is commonly referred to as a liquefaction zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, impact or vibratory driving is applied. Compared to impact driving, the vibratory driving produces less noise level, induce less damage to the pile, and offers a significantly higher penetration rates (Holeyman and Whenham 2017;Rausche 2002). In this study, the effects of vibratory driving on the soil are investigated by varying the installation frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%