Critical policy scholarship in education: An overview

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of critical policy scholarship (CPS) in education. Historically, policy research has been dominated by what is commonly referred to as the policy science tradition, which is positivist in its philosophical stance and instrumentalist in its purpose—it focuses on producing knowledge relevant for policy decisions. However, with the rise of interpretive social inquiry in the 1970s and against the backdrop of unique political developments in the 1980s, CPS emerged as an alternative policy research perspective. This review discusses the scope and foci of CPS in education under four themes: methodological assumptions, interdisciplinary roots, enduring analytical goals, and emerging empirical contexts. Implications of the prevalence of inequality, Big Data and digital panopticon for educational policymaking and policy research are also briefly discussed. The paper concludes that although its foci of analysis have shifted considerably in the last four decades, analytical interest and tools of CPS remain largely unchanged.

Teach For America influence on non-TFA teachers in TFA-hiring schools

“…Our interpretations of the data surrounding TFA -gathered in different ways over multiple years across diverse siteshas supported a general disposition that allows for critique of the organization. Moreover, and in line with the theoretical framing above (e.g., Levinson & Sutton, 2001;Molla, 2021;Shore & Wright, 2011), we do not see TFA (and its international variants) as purely rational solutions to objectively identified problems; therefore, the "shared problems, shared solutions" mantra (see Ahmann, 2015) does not resonate with our understandings of educational policies and the programs with which they are aligned. In fact, we do not view any policies in this manner, but instead understand problems themselves to be discursively created and politically motivated (e.g., Bacchi, 2009).…”

Political Foundations of Social Studies Curricula in the Context of Citizenship Education in Turkey: Government Programs and Development Plans

“…Geppert, Bauer-Hofmann and Hopmann (2012) stated that the autonomy granted to schools in Austria is growing and that examples, in which the central government affects schools, are decreasing. In addition, Molla (2021) reported that the influence of state and market on education is too big and emphasizes a new way of thinking (critical political research).…”

Policy Justice Through Critical Qualitative Inquiry: Examining the Issue of School Readiness

“…CQP researchers make methodological decisions that recognize “the value of methodological rigor , the contextuality of policy and the positionality of the policy analyst [emphasis in original]” (Molla, 2021, p. 4). They employ qualitative research methodologies because such work “never hides behind aggregated numbers, directing itself instead to portray in-depth pictures of actual individuals who operate under various veils of oppression (Lincoln, 2015, p. 198).…”