2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00705-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical pathways intervention to reduce length of hospital stay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
89
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
89
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies have been published that question the value of critical pathways (11)(12)(13)(14). These critiques revolve around three main points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A number of studies have been published that question the value of critical pathways (11)(12)(13)(14). These critiques revolve around three main points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics note that lengths of stay were declining prior to pathway implementation and that rates of decline were not increased by most pathways (13). Secondly, the selective application of pathways in some reports (4) is used by critics as evidence that the performance improvements attributed to critical pathways are simply the result of patient selection bias (12). Critics claim, accurately, that if healthier patients are placed on critical pathways, while patients with greater co-morbidities are placed in non-pathway control groups, then outcomes will invariably improve, independent of the efficacy of the pathway itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7 Critical pathway implementation has several advantages. First, quality of medical care can be improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%