2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical parameters involved in producing microspheres by prilling of molten lipids: From theoretical prediction of particle size to practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in cooling rate between the point of origin and the top of the sphere, led to an inhomogeneous shrinking process resulting in a stress field that created a cavity upon full solidification. These observations are in agreement with the characteristic shrinking properties of lipids during their crystallization [10,[32][33]. In contrast, the visualisation of droplet solidification of a transparent 30% MPT in BA solution revealed the creation of the expulsion at the surface of the final prills.…”
Section: Size and Shape Of The Prillssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The difference in cooling rate between the point of origin and the top of the sphere, led to an inhomogeneous shrinking process resulting in a stress field that created a cavity upon full solidification. These observations are in agreement with the characteristic shrinking properties of lipids during their crystallization [10,[32][33]. In contrast, the visualisation of droplet solidification of a transparent 30% MPT in BA solution revealed the creation of the expulsion at the surface of the final prills.…”
Section: Size and Shape Of The Prillssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Initial screening experiments revealed that sieved (150 µm) PAR in BA suspensions were processable up to a drug load of 20%, while sieved (50 µm) MET in BA suspensions were processable up to a drug load of at least 40%. Since viscosity is a critical process parameter during droplet formation at the nozzle, this difference in maximum processable drug load could be attributed to the higher viscosity of PAR in BA suspensions in comparison with MET in BA suspensions at equal drug loads [10,23]. Rheological experiments confirmed this hypothesis and revealed an almost Newtonian behaviour for MET suspensions while distinct shear thinning was observed for PAR suspensions (Fig.…”
Section: Processabilitymentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations