2022
DOI: 10.17660/th2022/002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical nitrogen and potassium levels and sufficiency ranges for banana cultivation in Ecuador

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these circumstances, the assessment of the nutritional status for bananas, shows states of su ciency, de ciency, or toxicity of nutrients that directly interfere with fruit productivity 3 . For this, the use of diagnostic methods that compare the results of leaf levels of nutrients in a sample with the appropriate nutritional standards obtained in crops with a high productivity is essential 4 , and may help in designing e cient nutrient management practices for improved crop yield 5 . This procedure for interpreting leaf nutritional values for bananas has traditionally been based on the standards critical level (CL) and/or su ciency range (SR) 6 , where, according with these authors, each nutrient is considered alone (univariate relationship) and not considering possible interactions between them 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these circumstances, the assessment of the nutritional status for bananas, shows states of su ciency, de ciency, or toxicity of nutrients that directly interfere with fruit productivity 3 . For this, the use of diagnostic methods that compare the results of leaf levels of nutrients in a sample with the appropriate nutritional standards obtained in crops with a high productivity is essential 4 , and may help in designing e cient nutrient management practices for improved crop yield 5 . This procedure for interpreting leaf nutritional values for bananas has traditionally been based on the standards critical level (CL) and/or su ciency range (SR) 6 , where, according with these authors, each nutrient is considered alone (univariate relationship) and not considering possible interactions between them 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%