2017
DOI: 10.1080/00036811.2017.1366989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical mass for an attraction–repulsion chemotaxis system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the sole insertion in the classical Keller–Segel model of a repulsive effect coming from another chemical substance does not suffice to avoid δ‐formations for the cells' density. More precisely, confining our attention to the linear diffusion case Afalse(u,v,wfalse)1$A(u,v,w)\equiv 1$, and fixing Bfalse(u,v,wfalse)=χu$B(u,v,w)=-\chi \nabla u$ and Cfalse(u,v,wfalse)=ξu$C(u,v,w)=\xi \nabla u$ (χ,ξ>0$\chi , \xi >0$), Dfalse(u,v,wfalse)0$D(u,v,w)\equiv 0$ and production rates Efalse(u,v,wfalse)=αuβv$E(u,v,w)=\alpha u-\beta v$, Ffalse(u,v,wfalse)=γuδw$F(u,v,w)=\gamma u-\delta w$ (α,β,γ,δ>0$\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,\delta >0$), for τ=0$\tau =0$, we have that the sign of ξγχα$\xi \gamma -\chi \alpha$ (positive repulsion prevails over attraction, negative attraction prevails over repulsion) establishes whether system (1.1) has unbounded solutions or all solutions are bounded: see the significant contribution [21] and [5, 6, 15 22] for some details on the issue.…”
Section: Introduction and Presentation Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the sole insertion in the classical Keller–Segel model of a repulsive effect coming from another chemical substance does not suffice to avoid δ‐formations for the cells' density. More precisely, confining our attention to the linear diffusion case Afalse(u,v,wfalse)1$A(u,v,w)\equiv 1$, and fixing Bfalse(u,v,wfalse)=χu$B(u,v,w)=-\chi \nabla u$ and Cfalse(u,v,wfalse)=ξu$C(u,v,w)=\xi \nabla u$ (χ,ξ>0$\chi , \xi >0$), Dfalse(u,v,wfalse)0$D(u,v,w)\equiv 0$ and production rates Efalse(u,v,wfalse)=αuβv$E(u,v,w)=\alpha u-\beta v$, Ffalse(u,v,wfalse)=γuδw$F(u,v,w)=\gamma u-\delta w$ (α,β,γ,δ>0$\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,\delta >0$), for τ=0$\tau =0$, we have that the sign of ξγχα$\xi \gamma -\chi \alpha$ (positive repulsion prevails over attraction, negative attraction prevails over repulsion) establishes whether system (1.1) has unbounded solutions or all solutions are bounded: see the significant contribution [21] and [5, 6, 15 22] for some details on the issue.…”
Section: Introduction and Presentation Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wanting to provide some details in this frame, for the fully elliptic version (i.e τ = 0 in the equations for v and w) of model (1) these results are available in the literature. When linear growths of the chemoattractant and the chemorepellent are considered, h(u, v) = αu, α > 0, and k(u, v) = γu, γ > 0, the value ξγ − χα, measuring the difference between the repulsion and attraction contributions, is critical for n = 2: particularly, if ξγ − χα > 0 (repulsion dominated regime), in any dimension all solutions to the model are globally bounded, whereas for ξγ − χα < 0 (attraction dominated regime) unbounded solutions can be detected (see [4,10,17,18,25] for some connected studies). On the other hand, for more general production laws, respectively h and k generalizing the prototypes h(u, v) = αu s , s > 0, and k(u, v) = γu r , r ≥ 1, we are only aware of the following recent result, valid for n ≥ 2 ( [19]): for every α, β, γ, δ, χ > 0, and r > s ≥ 1 (resp.…”
Section: Introduction and Presentation Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to the connection between the classical blow-up in the L ∞ (Ω)-norm of solutions to (1), i.e. relation (3), and that in the L 2 (Ω)-norm (and in general in the L p (Ω)-norm, p > 1), i.e. in the sense that lim sup Ω u 2 dx ր ∞ as t ց t * , we want to observe that once it is assumed that Ω is a bounded domain, we only know that u(·, t) L 2 (Ω) ≤ |Ω| 1 2 u(·, t) L ∞ (Ω) , so that if a solution blows up in the L 2 (Ω)-norm, it does in the L ∞ (Ω)-norm.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See also [9].) • In the recent paper [3] it is established that for n = 2 and χα − ξγ > 0, the value 4π χα−ξγ is the critical mass for the attraction-repulsion chemotaxis system (1) through which it is possible to identify global boundedness or possible finite time blow-up of solutions.…”
Section: Introduction and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%