“…Critiques of CMS often refer to their paradoxical and somewhat uncomfortable position within business schools and the management field (e.g., Rowlinson & Hassard, 2011), residing within the institutions they critique, while "operating from a safe distance" (Bo ¨hm & Spoelstra, 2004, p. 99). CMS has also been critiqued for closing off space for plural voices (Wray-Bliss, 2004), and for an over-focus on negative critique that leaves out consideration of how fields are "positively" constructed (McLean & Alcadipani, 2008). In short, the CMS project is constituted from within specific epistemic and institutional conditions (Mills & Mills, 2013), which are complementary to yet distinct from the psychologically informed analytical prism of W-O psychology.…”