2017
DOI: 10.1177/0022219417708168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Issues in the Understanding of Young Elementary School Students at Risk for Problems in Written Expression: Introduction to the Special Series

Abstract: In this introduction to the special series "Critical Issues in the Understanding of Young Elementary School Students at Risk for Problems in Written Expression," we consider some of the contextual factors that have changed since a similar special issue was published in the Journal of Learning Disabilities in 2002. We also explore how the five articles included in this special series address the following important themes: early writing development, identification of students with writing difficulties, and effe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this gap in the literature, we used a cross–sectional study design to examine the internalizing and externalizing behaviors of children who are AR–WD versus a comparison group of children who are TDW via behavioral ratings obtained from classroom teachers in grades 1 through 4. We recognize that the field has not yet come to consensus on how to identify risk, and that multiple means exist to do so (Coker & Kim, 2018). Within our sample, we have termed students as AR–WD based on cut scores on a theoretically grounded assessment, as is increasingly common (Barnes et al, 2019; Costa, Hooper, McBee, Anderson, & Yerby, 2012; Ray, Graham, & Liu, 2019).…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this gap in the literature, we used a cross–sectional study design to examine the internalizing and externalizing behaviors of children who are AR–WD versus a comparison group of children who are TDW via behavioral ratings obtained from classroom teachers in grades 1 through 4. We recognize that the field has not yet come to consensus on how to identify risk, and that multiple means exist to do so (Coker & Kim, 2018). Within our sample, we have termed students as AR–WD based on cut scores on a theoretically grounded assessment, as is increasingly common (Barnes et al, 2019; Costa, Hooper, McBee, Anderson, & Yerby, 2012; Ray, Graham, & Liu, 2019).…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some pupils have problems with learning how to read and write from the very start of their literacy learning journey, presenting numerous disabilities of reading and writing, including dyslexia. Pupils with Learning Disabilities (LD) range from 5 to 17.5% of the population in compulsory schooling, depending on the definitions and classifications used [3][4][5][6]. Prevalence also depends on the transparency and granularity of spelling systems, and LD are more frequent in opaque languages [6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early writing difficulties in elementary schools are estimated in the range of 12% to 44% [4]. Recent studies estimate between 6.9% to 14.7% found students experiencing specific learning difficulties in writing, with and without reading difficulties [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%