Critical Ideas in Times of Crisis: Reconsidering Smith, Marx, Keynes, and Hayek

Solomon, M. Scott

doi:10.1080/14747731003593356

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indeed despite the G20's early success in advancing a framework for global macroeconomic cooperation between states little progress towards a global Keynesian regime has since been made. However, Keynesian political economy and associated institutions have remained remarkably resilient in face of the dominance of neoliberalism globally over the past 40 years (Solomon 2010;Strange 2013). Despite the current dominance of austerity politics in much of the OECD, none of the basic and deeply embedded institutional legacies of the first Keynesian era have been fundamentally challenged by the responses to the crisis that have emerged.…”

Section: Towards a Post-listian Global Order?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a New Political Economy of Development

Strange¹

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global political economy is in flux as a series of cumulative crises impacts its organization and governance. The IPE series has tracked its development in both analysis and structure over the last three decades. It has always had a concentration on the global South. Now the South increasingly challenges the North as the centre of development, also reflected in a growing number of submissions and publications on indebted Eurozone economies in Southern Europe.An indispensable resource for scholars and researchers, the series examines a variety of capitalisms and connections by focusing on emerging economies, companies and sectors, debates and policies. It informs diverse policy communities as the established trans-Atlantic North declines and 'the rest', especially the BRICS, rise.

show abstract

Section: Towards a Post-listian Global Order?mentioning

confidence: 99%