Critical food policy literacy: Conceptualizing community municipal food policy engagement

Abstract

Food policies should be informed by those whom they intend to serve, but policy-making processes remain exclusive to privileged voices, knowledge, and experiences. Food activists, organizations, and academia have worked to make policy processes inclusive through training communities in food policy, potentially increasing their food policy literacy (FPL). In this paper, I argue that making food policy processes, information, and training accessible to community actors can better prepare them to participate in, interpret, and control food system policies, especially at the municipal level. I build on the premise that a clear understanding of food policies is a necessary (if not sufficient) condition for community engagement in food systems policy formulation, planning, and implementation. Existing literature has thoroughly defined food literacy (FL) and policy literacy (PL), but there has been very limited work on defining “food policy literacy.” To address this conceptual gap, this article bridges food and policy scholarship with the critical literacy work of Paulo Freire to answer: How do we understand literacies tied to food policy? What does (or what could) it mean to be food policy literate? How can critical literacy tied into food policy transform food systems? Following this analysis, I propose critical FPL is a ‘reading of the world and of words,’ a critical awareness of food policy processes, a contextual and authentic learning practice, and a collective engagement with food policy transformation.

Untitled

“…Consequently, food policy inherently involves intricate technical considerations and complex trade-offs. This often results in decisions being made by experts and government regulators, leaving little room for citizens' voices and opinions to be heard (Ramos-Gerena, 2023). Fundamentally, such an arrangement assumes that citizens are incapable, under the right conditions, of understanding complex subjects and engaging in meaningful, well-informed dialogues, despite evidence to the contrary (Burgess, 2012).…”

Reversing food-land relationships in the city: Insights from the Seeding East Buffalo Fellowship Program

“…Black and brown residents in the U.S. are growing food in cities to directly demand a dignified life and denounce the precarious conditions in their neighborhoods. They collectively learn and share knowledge about urban agriculture (UA) and food policy literacy (Ramos-Gerena, 2023) to resist and reverse historical disinvestment in their regions.…”